Shriyan Bharati, Patil Deepali, Gurjar Murari, Nookala Manjunath, Patil Anand, Kannan Sadhana, Patil Vijay, Joshi Amit, Noronha Vanita, Prabhash Kumar, Gota Vikram
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Center, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 410210, India.
Department of Biostatistics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Center, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 410210, India.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;76(10):1427-1436. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02926-9. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
Patients of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases have limited treatment options. High-dose erlotinib (HDE) and gefitinib (HDG) have been tried in the past. This study investigates the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disposition and safety of both, high-dose erlotinib and gefitinib regimens.
Eleven and nine patients were treated with erlotinib and gefitinib, respectively. All patients received 1 week of standard dose of erlotinib (150 mg OD) or gefitinib (250 mg OD), followed by the high dose (1500 mg weekly for erlotinib and 1250 mg OD for gefitinib) from day 8. Blood and CSF samples were collected on days 7 and 15, 4 h after the morning dose and drug levels determined using LC-MS/MS. Adverse events were documented as per CTCAE 4.03 till day 15.
Pulsatile HDE and daily HDG resulted in 1.4- and 1.9-fold increase in CSF levels, respectively. A constant 2% CSF penetration rate was observed across both doses of erlotinib, while for gefitinib the penetration rate for high dose was half that of the standard dose suggesting a nonlinear disposition. Three patients on HDE treatment discontinued treatment after the first dose due to intolerable toxicities, whereas HDG was better tolerated with no treatment discontinuations. Since CSF disposition of gefitinib followed saturable kinetics, a lower dose of 750 mg was found to achieve CSF concentrations comparable to that of the 1250 mg dose.
HDG was better tolerated than HDE. CSF disposition of gefitinib was found to be saturable at a higher dose. Based on these findings, the dose of 750 mg OD should be considered for further evaluation in this setting.
脑转移的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗选择有限。过去曾尝试过高剂量厄洛替尼(HDE)和吉非替尼(HDG)。本研究调查高剂量厄洛替尼和吉非替尼方案的脑脊液(CSF)分布及安全性。
分别有11例和9例患者接受厄洛替尼和吉非替尼治疗。所有患者均接受1周的标准剂量厄洛替尼(150mg每日一次)或吉非替尼(250mg每日一次),从第8天起接受高剂量治疗(厄洛替尼每周1500mg,吉非替尼每日1250mg)。在第7天和第15天上午给药后4小时采集血液和脑脊液样本,使用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定药物水平。按照CTCAE 4.03记录至第15天的不良事件。
脉冲式HDE和每日HDG分别使脑脊液水平增加1.4倍和1.9倍。两种剂量的厄洛替尼脑脊液渗透率均恒定为2%,而吉非替尼高剂量的渗透率是标准剂量的一半,表明其分布呈非线性。3例接受HDE治疗的患者在首剂后因无法耐受的毒性反应而停药,而HDG耐受性较好,无停药情况。由于吉非替尼的脑脊液分布遵循饱和动力学,发现较低剂量750mg可达到与1250mg剂量相当的脑脊液浓度。
HDG的耐受性优于HDE。发现吉非替尼在较高剂量时脑脊液分布呈饱和状态。基于这些发现,应考虑750mg每日一次的剂量在此情况下进行进一步评估。