• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴的一点帮助:同学对青少年亲社会行为发展的影响。

With a Little Help from Their Peers: The Impact of Classmates on Adolescents' Development of Prosocial Behavior.

机构信息

University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Sep;49(9):1849-1863. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01260-8. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-020-01260-8
PMID:32529342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7423867/
Abstract

Peer groups are critical socialization agents for the development of social behavior in adolescence, but studies examining peer-group effects on individuals' prosocial behavior are scarce. Using a two-wave, multilevel data set (N = 16,893, 8481 male; 8412 female; mean age at Time 1: 14.0 years) from 1308 classes in 252 secondary schools in Germany, main effects of the classroom level of prosocial behavior, cross-level interactions between the classroom and the individual levels of prosocial behavior at Time 1, and the moderating role of gender were examined. The results showed that adolescents in classrooms with high collective levels of prosocial behavior at Time 1 reported more prosocial behavior at Time 2, about two years later, reflecting a class-level main effect. A significant cross-level interaction indicated that a high classroom level of prosocial behavior particularly affected individuals with lower levels of prosocial behavior at Time 1. The influence of same-gender peers was larger compared with opposite-gender peers. The findings are discussed with respect to social learning mechanisms in the development of prosocial behavior and their implications for interventions to promote prosocial behavior.

摘要

同伴群体是青少年社会行为发展的关键社会化因素,但关于同伴群体对个体亲社会行为影响的研究却很少。本研究使用来自德国 252 所中学的 1308 个班级的两波多层次数据集(N=16893,男性 8412 名,女性 8412 名;第 1 次时间点的平均年龄为 14.0 岁),考察了课堂亲社会行为水平的主要影响、第 1 次时间点课堂和亲社会行为个体水平之间的交叉水平交互作用,以及性别调节作用。结果表明,第 1 次时间点具有较高集体亲社会行为水平的班级中的青少年在大约两年后的第 2 次时间点报告了更多的亲社会行为,反映了班级水平的主要效应。显著的交叉水平交互作用表明,较高的课堂亲社会行为水平尤其会影响第 1 次时间点亲社会行为水平较低的个体。讨论了这些发现,涉及亲社会行为发展中的社会学习机制及其对促进亲社会行为干预的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/7423867/26244acfcae8/10964_2020_1260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/7423867/d73725297ce4/10964_2020_1260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/7423867/21404ffc7c52/10964_2020_1260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/7423867/26244acfcae8/10964_2020_1260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/7423867/d73725297ce4/10964_2020_1260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/7423867/21404ffc7c52/10964_2020_1260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/7423867/26244acfcae8/10964_2020_1260_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
With a Little Help from Their Peers: The Impact of Classmates on Adolescents' Development of Prosocial Behavior.同伴的一点帮助:同学对青少年亲社会行为发展的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Sep;49(9):1849-1863. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01260-8. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
2
Avoiding antisocial behavior among adolescents: The positive influence of classmates' prosocial behavior.避免青少年的反社会行为:同学亲社会行为的积极影响。
J Adolesc. 2018 Oct;68:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
3
The Role of Classmates' Modeling and Reinforcement in Adolescents' Perceived Classroom Peer Context.同学榜样作用和强化在青少年感知的课堂同伴环境中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Feb;50(2):260-270. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01325-8. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
4
Who Sets the Aggressive Popularity Norm in Classrooms? It's the Number and Strength of Aggressive, Prosocial, and Bi-Strategic Adolescents.谁在课堂上设定了激进的受欢迎规范?是具有攻击性、亲社会和双策略的青少年的数量和实力。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00571-0.
5
Peer Influence, Peer Status, and Prosocial Behavior: An Experimental Investigation of Peer Socialization of Adolescents' Intentions to Volunteer.同伴影响、同伴地位与亲社会行为:青少年志愿服务意愿同伴社会化的实验研究
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Dec;44(12):2197-210. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0373-2. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
6
Do Adolescents Adopt the Prosocial Behaviors of the Classmates They Like? A Social Network Analysis on Prosocial Contagion.青少年会效仿他们喜欢的同学的亲社会行为吗?一项关于亲社会行为传播的社会网络分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan;54(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02037-z. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
7
The Role of Prosocial and Aggressive Popularity Norm Combinations in Prosocial and Aggressive Friendship Processes.亲社会和攻击性受欢迎规范组合在亲社会和攻击性友谊发展过程中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar;49(3):645-663. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01088-x. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
8
Prosocial behavior as a protective factor against peers' acceptance of aggression in the development of aggressive behavior in childhood and adolescence.亲社会行为作为一种保护因素,可以防止儿童和青少年时期的攻击性行为被同伴接受,从而预防攻击性行为的发展。
J Adolesc. 2019 Jul;74:146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Social network cohesion in school classes promotes prosocial behavior.学校班级中的社交网络凝聚力促进亲社会行为。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0194656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194656. eCollection 2018.
10
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
We Need a Village: School Connectedness Empowers Students to Move Beyond Bystanding Under an Anti-Bullying Climate.我们需要一个社群:在反欺凌的环境下,学校归属感促使学生不再袖手旁观。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02249-x.
2
Classroom-Level and Individual-Level Prosociality and Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Adolescents.青少年在课堂层面和个人层面的亲社会行为与求助行为
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510319. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10319.
3
The connecting brain in context: How adolescent plasticity supports learning and development.

本文引用的文献

1
Social norms and e-motions in problematic social media use among adolescents.青少年问题性社交媒体使用中的社会规范与情绪
Addict Behav Rep. 2020 Jan 21;11:100250. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100250. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Receiving Prosocial Behavior: Examining the Reciprocal Associations between Positive Peer Treatment and Psychosocial and Behavioral Outcomes.接受亲社会行为:检验积极同伴对待与心理社会和行为结果之间的互惠关系。
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Jun;30(2):458-470. doi: 10.1111/jora.12537. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Parents modelling, peer influence and peer selection impact on adolescent smoking behavior: A longitudinal study in two age cohorts.
情境中的连接大脑:青少年可塑性如何支持学习与发展。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jan;71:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101486. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
4
Stronger together: perspectives on gratitude social processes in group interventions for adolescents.团结就是力量:青少年团体干预中感恩社会过程的观点
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 17;15:1476511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1476511. eCollection 2024.
5
Empathy as a Mediator of the Relation between Peer Influence and Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis.共情作为同伴影响与青少年亲社会行为关系的中介变量:一项元分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar;54(3):682-703. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02079-3. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
The associations between interparental conflict and adolescent adjustment: a cross-lagged panel network analysis.父母间冲突与青少年适应之间的关联:一项交叉滞后面板网络分析。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;34(2):763-777. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02525-4. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Student's and Classmates' Prosocial Behavior predict Academic Engagement in Middle School.学生和同学的亲社会行为预测中学生的学业投入。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Dec;53(12):2789-2800. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02027-1. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Unfair teachers, unhappy students: longitudinal associations of perceived teacher relational unfairness with adolescent peer aggression and school satisfaction.不公平的教师,不开心的学生:感知到的教师关系不公平与青少年同伴攻击行为和学校满意度的纵向关联。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1321050. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1321050. eCollection 2024.
9
Peer factors and prosocial behavior among Chinese adolescents from difficult families.困难家庭青少年的同伴因素与亲社会行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 8;14(1):815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50292-0.
10
Promoting Peer Connectedness Through Social-Emotional Learning: Evaluating the Intervention Effect Mechanisms and Implementation Factors of a Social-Emotional Learning Programme for 9 to 12-Year-Olds.通过社会情感学习促进同伴关系:评估一项针对 9 至 12 岁儿童的社会情感学习计划的干预效果机制和实施因素。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Jan;53(1):89-116. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01871-x. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
父母榜样作用、同伴影响和同伴选择对青少年吸烟行为的影响:两个年龄队列的纵向研究。
Addict Behav. 2020 Jan;100:106131. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106131. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
4
The Role of Prosocial and Aggressive Popularity Norm Combinations in Prosocial and Aggressive Friendship Processes.亲社会和攻击性受欢迎规范组合在亲社会和攻击性友谊发展过程中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar;49(3):645-663. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01088-x. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Who Sets the Aggressive Popularity Norm in Classrooms? It's the Number and Strength of Aggressive, Prosocial, and Bi-Strategic Adolescents.谁在课堂上设定了激进的受欢迎规范?是具有攻击性、亲社会和双策略的青少年的数量和实力。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00571-0.
6
Violent video games, externalizing behavior, and prosocial behavior: A five-year longitudinal study during adolescence.暴力视频游戏、外化行为与亲社会行为:青少年时期的一项为期五年的纵向研究。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Oct;54(10):1868-1880. doi: 10.1037/dev0000574.
7
Avoiding antisocial behavior among adolescents: The positive influence of classmates' prosocial behavior.避免青少年的反社会行为:同学亲社会行为的积极影响。
J Adolesc. 2018 Oct;68:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
8
Perceived peer and school norm effects on youth antisocial and prosocial behaviours through intergroup contact in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰的群体间接触对青少年反社会和亲社会行为的感知同伴和学校规范影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jul;57(3):652-665. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12257. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
Age differences in the prosocial influence effect.年龄对亲社会影响效应的影响。
Dev Sci. 2018 Nov;21(6):e12666. doi: 10.1111/desc.12666. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
10
An integrative theoretical understanding of aggression: a brief exposition.攻击性的综合理论理解:简要阐述。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Feb;19:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 20.