Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Microvasc Res. 2020 Sep;131:104030. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2020.104030. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
Previous studies indicate that sex-related differences exist in the regulation of cutaneous vasodilation, however, the mechanisms remain unresolved. We assessed if sex-differences in young adults exist for cholinergic, nicotinic, and β-adrenergic cutaneous vasodilation with a focus on nitric oxide synthase (NOS), cyclooxygenase (COX), and K channel mechanisms. In twelve young men and thirteen young women, four intradermal forearm skin sites were perfused with the following: 1) lactated Ringer's solution (control), 2) 10 mM N-nitro-l-arginine, a non-selective NOS inhibitor, 3) 10 mM ketorolac, a non-selective COX inhibitor, or 4) 50 mM BaCl, a nonspecific K channel blocker. At all four sites, cutaneous vasodilation was induced by 1) 10 mM nicotine, a nicotinic receptor agonist, 2) 100 μM isoproterenol, a nonselective β-adrenergic receptor agonist, and 3) 2 mM and 2000 mM acetylcholine, an acetylcholine receptor agonist. Nicotine and isoproterenol were administered for 3 min, whereas each acetylcholine dose was administered for 25 min. Regardless of treatment site, cutaneous vasodilation in response to nicotine and a high dose of acetylcholine (2000 mM) were lower in women than men. By contrast, isoproterenol induced cutaneous vasodilation was greater in women vs. men. Irrespective of sex, NOS inhibition or K channel blockade attenuated isoproterenol-mediated cutaneous vasodilation, whereas K channel blockade decreased nicotine-induced cutaneous vasodilation. Taken together, our findings indicate that while the mechanisms underlying cutaneous vasodilation are comparable between young men and women, sex-related differences in the magnitude of cutaneous vasodilation do exist and this response differs as a function of the receptor agonist.
先前的研究表明,皮肤血管舒张的调节存在与性别相关的差异,但这些机制仍未得到解决。我们评估了年轻人中是否存在胆碱能、烟碱能和β-肾上腺素能皮肤血管舒张的性别差异,并重点关注一氧化氮合酶(NOS)、环氧化酶(COX)和 K 通道机制。在 12 名年轻男性和 13 名年轻女性中,四个前臂皮肤的皮内部位分别接受以下四种物质的灌注:1)乳酸林格氏液(对照)、2)10 mM N-硝基-L-精氨酸,一种非选择性 NOS 抑制剂、3)10 mM 酮咯酸,一种非选择性 COX 抑制剂或 4)50 mM BaCl,一种非特异性 K 通道阻滞剂。在所有四个部位,皮肤血管舒张由以下物质引起:1)10 mM 尼古丁,一种烟碱能受体激动剂、2)100 μM 异丙肾上腺素,一种非选择性β-肾上腺素能受体激动剂和 3)2 mM 和 2000 mM 乙酰胆碱,一种乙酰胆碱受体激动剂。尼古丁和异丙肾上腺素给药 3 分钟,而每种乙酰胆碱剂量给药 25 分钟。无论治疗部位如何,女性对尼古丁和高剂量乙酰胆碱(2000 mM)的皮肤血管舒张反应均低于男性。相比之下,异丙肾上腺素引起的皮肤血管舒张在女性中大于男性。无论性别如何,NOS 抑制或 K 通道阻断均可减弱异丙肾上腺素介导的皮肤血管舒张,而 K 通道阻断可降低尼古丁诱导的皮肤血管舒张。总之,我们的发现表明,尽管年轻男性和女性皮肤血管舒张的机制相似,但皮肤血管舒张的幅度确实存在与性别相关的差异,这种反应因受体激动剂的不同而有所不同。