Liguori Claudio, Manfredi Natalia, Renna Rosaria, Izzi Francesca, Pagliuca Mauro, Pagliuca Francesco, Mercuri Nicola Biagio, Fabio Placidi
Epilepsy Centre, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome.
UOC Neurologia, A.O.R.N. "A. Cardarelli", Naples.
Epileptic Disord. 2020 Jun 1;22(3):309-316. doi: 10.1684/epd.2020.1165.
Perampanel (PER) and brivaracetam (BRV) are third-generation antiseizure medications. The aim of the present retrospective, double-centre study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability between PER and BRV in adult patients with epilepsy. We reviewed the clinical charts of patients affected by epilepsy, admitted to the Epilepsy Centre at the University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata" and the Cardarelli Hospital in Naples, who started BRV or PER as add-on treatment for controlling seizures with a follow-up of 12 months. Seizure freedom, >50% seizure reduction, retention rate, and adverse events reported during follow-up were compared between the two drugs. Moreover, we considered the effects of both drugs in specific subsets of patients: age ≥60 years, male or female, in patients with genetic generalized epilepsy, and considering previous treatment with levetiracetam (LEV). Forty-three patients treated with BRV and 64 patients treated with PER were included in this study and followed at both sites for 12 months. Similar effectiveness was observed between BRV and PER, with similar rates of seizure freedom (30% vs 31%) and >50% seizure reduction (32% vs 34%) during follow-up. Moreover, PER and BRV discontinuation rates, due to ineffectiveness or adverse events, were similar. Groups of patients who started BRV or PER as first add-on treatments were also compared but no differences in effectiveness or tolerability were identified. Lastly, BRV was shown to be more effective in patients who were not previously treated with LEV. This retrospective study reveals comparable effectiveness and tolerability between PER and BRV also when used as first add-on treatments, in patients with epilepsy.
吡仑帕奈(PER)和布瓦西坦(BRV)是第三代抗癫痫药物。本项回顾性双中心研究的目的是比较PER和BRV在成年癫痫患者中的有效性和耐受性。我们回顾了罗马第二大学医院癫痫中心和那不勒斯卡达雷利医院收治的癫痫患者的临床病历,这些患者开始使用BRV或PER作为控制癫痫发作的附加治疗,并进行了12个月的随访。比较了两种药物在随访期间报告的无癫痫发作、癫痫发作减少>50%、保留率和不良事件。此外,我们还考虑了两种药物在特定患者亚组中的效果:年龄≥60岁、男性或女性、遗传性全身性癫痫患者,以及考虑先前使用左乙拉西坦(LEV)治疗的患者。本研究纳入了43例接受BRV治疗的患者和64例接受PER治疗的患者,并在两个研究地点进行了12个月的随访。BRV和PER之间观察到相似的有效性,随访期间无癫痫发作率(30%对31%)和癫痫发作减少>50%的比例(32%对34%)相似。此外,由于无效或不良事件导致的PER和BRV停药率相似。还比较了开始使用BRV或PER作为首次附加治疗的患者组,但未发现有效性或耐受性方面的差异。最后,BRV在先前未接受LEV治疗的患者中显示出更有效。这项回顾性研究表明,PER和BRV在癫痫患者中作为首次附加治疗使用时,也具有相当的有效性和耐受性。