Strzelczyk Adam, Zaveta Clara, von Podewils Felix, Möddel Gabriel, Langenbruch Lisa, Kovac Stjepana, Mann Catrin, Willems Laurent M, Schulz Juliane, Fiedler Barbara, Kurlemann Gerhard, Schubert-Bast Susanne, Rosenow Felix, Beuchat Isabelle
Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
LOEWE Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Epilepsia. 2021 Dec;62(12):2994-3004. doi: 10.1111/epi.17087. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice.
A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021.
Long-term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5-81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost-to-follow-up), including 10.9% reported as seizure-free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow-up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25-400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short-term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long-term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons.
BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of >50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short-term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long-term outcomes.
本研究旨在评估在临床实践中添加布瓦西坦(BRV)的长期疗效、保留率和耐受性。
一项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年2月至11月开始使用BRV的所有患者,观察至2021年2月。
分析了262例患者(平均年龄 = 40岁,范围 = 5 - 81岁,男性129例)的长期数据,其中227例(87%)诊断为局灶性癫痫,19例(7%)为遗传性全面性癫痫,16例(6%)为其他或未分类的癫痫综合征。只有26例(10%)患者从未接受过左乙拉西坦(LEV),而133例(50.8%)是从LEV转换而来。BRV暴露时间从1天到5年不等,中位保留时间为1.6年,BRV总暴露时间为6829个月(569年)。12个月时的保留率为61.1%,报告的有效率为33.1%(79/239;50%的缓解率,23例失访),其中10.9%报告为无癫痫发作。整个研究期间的保留率为50.8%,在最后一次随访时,133例患者接受BRV治疗,平均剂量为222±104mg(中位数 = 200,范围 = 25 - 400),其中52例(39.1%)超过了200mg的推荐上限剂量。较少的联合抗癫痫药物以及从LEV转换为BRV与更好的短期反应相关,但没有研究参数与长期阳性结果相关。63例(24%)患者因疗效不佳停用BRV,29例(11%)因精神行为不良事件停用,25例(10%)因其他不良事件停用,24例(9%)因其他原因停用。
尽管90%的纳入患者曾接受过LEV治疗,但BRV在12个月时显示出临床有用的33%的50%缓解率,总体保留率>50%。BRV耐受性良好;然而,每10例患者中有1例发生精神行为不良事件。虽然我们确定了短期反应和保留的预测因素,但我们无法确定长期结果的显著预测因素。