Rawson Nigel S B
Eastlake Research Group, Oakville, Ontario, Canada;
Canadian Health Policy Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun 1;27(2):e58-e67. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i2.673.
A previous assessment of the alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada completed between 2014 and 2018 demonstrated that it is working for governments but has yet to lead to improved access in a timely manner for all appropriate patients in all provinces. In this analysis, drugs for rare and ultra-rare disorders with a completed price negotiation or no negotiation between 2014 and 2018 in Canada, and their reimbursement recommendations and listings in Canadian public drug programs are compared with their regulatory approval in New Zealand and listing in the New Zealand National Formulary. The results show that pharmaceutical manufacturers generally seek regulatory approval for rare disorder drugs in Canada before New Zealand, and fewer rare disorder medicines receive regulatory approval in New Zealand. One reason for this difference might be New Zealand's smaller population. However, another reason is likely the restrictive drug formulary in New Zealand. Drugs not given coverage in New Zealand are frequently made unavailable by the manufacturer. Planned changes to Canada's pricing regulations and guidelines will significantly diminish the country's attractiveness as a place in which pharmaceutical companies want to do business, which has the potential to negatively impact the health of all Canadians irrespective of whether they have private or public drug coverage.
此前对2014年至2018年间加拿大针对罕见病新药的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性进行的评估表明,这一举措对政府而言是有效的,但尚未及时让所有省份的所有合适患者都能更好地获得药物。在本分析中,将2014年至2018年间在加拿大已完成价格谈判或未进行谈判的罕见病和超罕见病药物,及其报销建议和在加拿大公共药物计划中的列名情况,与它们在新西兰的监管批准情况及在《新西兰国家处方集》中的列名情况进行了比较。结果显示,制药商通常在加拿大比在新西兰更早寻求罕见病药物的监管批准,且在新西兰获得监管批准的罕见病药物较少。造成这种差异的一个原因可能是新西兰人口较少。然而,另一个原因可能是新西兰严格的药品处方集。在新西兰未获得医保覆盖的药物,制造商经常不再提供。加拿大定价法规和指南的计划变更将显著降低该国作为制药公司开展业务之地的吸引力,这有可能对所有加拿大人的健康产生负面影响,无论他们拥有私人还是公共药物保险。