• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大罕见病药物的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:谁受益?

Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?

机构信息

, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Canadian Health Policy Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jun 13;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x
PMID:35698235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9190095/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2014, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), which performs health technology assessments for all federal, provincial and territorial government drug programs (except Quebec's) and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA), which conducts price negotiations with manufacturers for all government drug programs, have been aligning their processes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine trends in CADTH recommendations for non-oncology drugs for rare disorders (DRDs) released between 2014 and 2021, results of pCPA negotiations for the same drugs, and listings in government drug plans to assess who benefits from the alignment.

RESULTS

Recommendations were positive in 87% of the reviews, although all included clinical criteria for use and/or economic conditions. Almost 90% of the DRDs with a positive recommendation had a successful price negotiation and 71% of those with a negative recommendation had no negotiation. Although no recommendation published before mid-2016 had a specified price reduction, almost 95% of those issued afterwards included the price reduction required to achieve a specific low cost-effectiveness threshold. The median time between the DRDs receiving marketing approval and a completed price negotiation was 663 days. Negotiations for DRDs completed after 2017 generally had fewer listings in government drug plans, but there was no distinct trend. The drug's price likely played a role in listing decisions. When DRDs were listed, drug plans had access criteria consistent with CADTH's or stronger for all the DRDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The governments who own, fund and manage CADTH and the pCPA benefit from their alignment. The alignment is less beneficial for patients waiting for access to the DRDs. The time taken by CADTH and pCPA actions and individual government drug plans to make listing decisions delays access. CADTH's clinical criteria have become more extensive and are applied rigorously by drug plans which restricts patient access to DRDs. Canadians with rare disorders urgently need their governments to implement a long-overdue, comprehensive rare disease strategy to ensure DRDs are reviewed and reimbursed quickly and equitably to provide adequate health care to all who need them.

摘要

背景

自 2014 年以来,加拿大药品和技术评估机构(CADTH)一直在为所有联邦、省和地区政府药品计划(魁北克省除外)以及全加药品采购联盟(pCPA)进行健康技术评估,pCPA 与所有政府药品计划的制造商进行价格谈判。CADTH 和 pCPA 一直在调整他们的流程。

目的

研究 2014 年至 2021 年间 CADTH 对罕见疾病药物(DRD)的非肿瘤药物建议的趋势、pCPA 对相同药物的谈判结果以及政府药品计划中的上市情况,以评估谁从调整中受益。

结果

在 87%的审查中,建议是积极的,尽管所有建议都包含了使用的临床标准和/或经济条件。近 90%的阳性推荐 DRD 药物的价格谈判都取得了成功,而 71%的阴性推荐 DRD 药物的价格谈判则没有成功。虽然 2016 年年中之前发布的任何建议都没有指定降价,但之后发布的建议几乎都包含了达到特定低成本效益阈值所需的降价。DRD 获得市场批准到完成价格谈判的中位数时间为 663 天。2017 年后完成谈判的 DRD 药物在政府药品计划中的上市数量通常较少,但没有明显的趋势。药物的价格可能在上市决策中发挥了作用。当 DRD 药物上市时,药品计划的准入标准与 CADTH 或更严格的准入标准一致。

结论

拥有、资助和管理 CADTH 和 pCPA 的政府从他们的调整中受益。这种调整对等待获得 DRD 的患者的益处较小。CADTH 和 pCPA 采取行动以及各个政府药品计划做出上市决策所花费的时间延迟了患者获得药物的机会。CADTH 的临床标准已经变得更加广泛,并且被药品计划严格执行,这限制了患者获得 DRD 的机会。患有罕见疾病的加拿大人迫切需要他们的政府实施一项姗姗来迟的、全面的罕见疾病战略,以确保迅速、公平地审查和报销 DRD,为所有需要的人提供足够的医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/837a/9190095/da4809d3e818/13023_2022_2390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/837a/9190095/da4809d3e818/13023_2022_2390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/837a/9190095/da4809d3e818/13023_2022_2390_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?加拿大罕见病药物的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:谁受益?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jun 13;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x.
2
Alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: Does it lead to improved patient access?加拿大罕见病新药的卫生技术评估与价格谈判的一致性:是否能提高患者的可及性?
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 13;27(1):e48-e64. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i1.658.
3
Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.加拿大肿瘤药物卫生技术评估与价格谈判的及时性
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 25;16:437-445. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872. eCollection 2024.
4
The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.支付意愿阈值对肿瘤药物降价建议的影响:加拿大卫生药品和技术局所做评估综述
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 May;13(5):e230178. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0178. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
Regulatory approval and public drug plan listing of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada and New Zealand.加拿大和新西兰针对罕见病的新药的监管批准及纳入公共药品计划清单。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun 1;27(2):e58-e67. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i2.673.
6
Activities of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance: An Observational Analysis.泛加拿大制药联盟的活动:一项观察性分析。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 7;25(2):e12-e22. doi: 10.22374/1710-6222.25.2.2.
7
HTA decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: comparison of processes across countries.罕见病药物的 HTA 决策:各国流程比较。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jul 8;17(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02397-4.
8
Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations.肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估过程:加拿大药品和卫生技术局(CADTH)的变化对公共支付方报销建议的影响
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;29(3):1514-1526. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030127.
9
Health technology assessment of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: impact of disease prevalence and cost.加拿大罕见病新药的卫生技术评估:疾病患病率和成本的影响
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Mar 23;12(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0611-7.
10
Do reimbursement recommendation processes used by government drug plans in Canada adhere to good governance principles?加拿大政府药品计划所采用的报销推荐流程是否遵循良好治理原则?
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Nov 22;9:721-730. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S144695. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.加拿大肿瘤药物卫生技术评估与价格谈判的及时性
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 25;16:437-445. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872. eCollection 2024.
2
Focused Jurisdictional Scan of Glomerulonephritis Medication Access in Canada: A Program Report.加拿大肾小球肾炎药物可及性的重点管辖区域扫描:项目报告
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Aug 12;10:20543581231190227. doi: 10.1177/20543581231190227. eCollection 2023.
3
Ethical challenges and opportunities in the development and approval of novel therapeutics for rare diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
An international comparative analysis of public reimbursement of orphan drugs in Canadian provinces compared to European countries.对加拿大省份与欧洲国家的孤儿药公共报销进行的国际比较分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Mar 4;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02260-6.
2
Do reimbursement recommendation processes used by government drug plans in Canada adhere to good governance principles?加拿大政府药品计划所采用的报销推荐流程是否遵循良好治理原则?
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Nov 22;9:721-730. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S144695. eCollection 2017.
3
Health technology assessment of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: impact of disease prevalence and cost.
罕见病新型疗法研发与审批中的伦理挑战与机遇。
J Med Access. 2023 Jun 6;7:27550834231177507. doi: 10.1177/27550834231177507. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Translating Precision Health for Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.儿科精准医疗的翻译:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2023 May 17;10(5):897. doi: 10.3390/children10050897.
加拿大罕见病新药的卫生技术评估:疾病患病率和成本的影响
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Mar 23;12(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0611-7.