Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Department of Ophthalmology, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0234664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234664. eCollection 2020.
To compare quantitative changes in macular parameters in diabetic patients detected by two optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) instruments.
80 phakic eyes were classified as no diabetes, diabetes without diabetic retinopathy (DR), mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and severe NPDR or proliferative DR (PDR). OCTA was performed using devices from two manufacturers (Zeiss and Heidelberg). Superficial and deeper vascular skeleton density (SVSD, DVSD), superficial and deeper vessel area density (SVAD, DVAD), choriocapillaris flow voids (CCFV), and choroidal flow voids (CFV) were calculated. Inter-device comparisons were performed using the size comparison index (SCI) and the discrepancy index (DI).
The two devices were inconsistent in SVSD, DVSD, DVAD, CCFV and CFV parameters (all P < 0.05). In addition, the SCI was positive for DVAD (all P < 0.001) and negative for SVSD, DVSD, CCFV and CFV in all groups (all P <0.001), except for DVSD in severe NPDR or PDR. The discrepancy index was not significantly different among groups for SVD, SPD, DVD, DPD and CFV (all P> 0.05). The mean DI of CCFV was statistically different between the four groups (P < 0.001).
The two instruments were largely inconsistent in the measurement of macular parameters relevant to DR. The choice of imaging device can impact OCTA analytics and should be taken into account when drawing conclusions about DR-related changes.
比较两种光相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)仪器检测糖尿病患者黄斑参数的定量变化。
80 例正视眼患者分为无糖尿病、无糖尿病性视网膜病变(DR)的糖尿病、轻度非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)和重度 NPDR 或增生性 DR(PDR)。使用来自两个制造商(蔡司和海德堡)的 OCTA 设备进行检查。计算浅层和深层血管骨架密度(SVSD、DVSD)、浅层和深层血管面积密度(SVAD、DVAD)、脉络膜毛细血管无灌注(CCFV)和脉络膜血流缺失(CFV)。使用大小比较指数(SCI)和差异指数(DI)进行设备间比较。
两种设备在 SVSD、DVSD、DVAD、CCFV 和 CFV 参数上存在不一致(均 P < 0.05)。此外,SCI 在所有组中均为 DVAD 阳性(均 P < 0.001),SVSD、DVSD、CCFV 和 CFV 均为阴性(均 P<0.001),除重度 NPDR 或 PDR 组的 DVSD 外。差异指数在 SVD、SPD、DVD、DPD 和 CFV 方面在各组之间无显著差异(均 P> 0.05)。CCFV 的平均 DI 在四组之间存在统计学差异(P < 0.001)。
两种仪器在测量与 DR 相关的黄斑参数方面存在较大差异。成像设备的选择会影响 OCTA 分析,在得出与 DR 相关变化的结论时应考虑到这一点。