• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在连线测验中提供字母支持:提高字母自动化不足的参与者的效度。

Offering alphabet support in the Trail Making Test: Increasing validity for participants with insufficient automatization of the alphabet.

作者信息

Egeland Jens, Follesø Knut

机构信息

Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.

Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Jul-Aug;29(4):478-485. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1774377. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1080/23279095.2020.1774377
PMID:32546072
Abstract

Insufficient automatization of the alphabet may falsely impair performance on the Trail Making Test among persons with dyslexia or persons not accustomed to the Latin alphabet. We analyze whether writing the alphabet on top of the test sheet changes performance in these risk groups, and whether alphabet support reduces the complexity of the set-shifting task.One-hundred and seventy patients referred to neuropsychological assessment participated and were given both a TMT-version offering alphabet support and the D-KEFS TMT. The discrepancy between the D-KEFS subtask where lines are drawn successively between numbers only, and the task where lines are drawn between letters only, was operationalized as measuring insufficient alphabet automatization.Both the possible dyslexia group, and persons taught to read with another alphabet, had a larger discrepancy score than the remaining sample. Regression analyses showed that the discrepancy scores explained 3.4% of the variance beyond age and speed when giving alphabet support. The corresponding percentage for the D-KEFS Switching task was 17.5%. The findings indicate that alphabet support alleviated effects of non-automatization. The TMT-B-NR: TMT-A ratio score was equivalent to what is found when not applying alphabet support, showing that alphabet support did not contaminate the test as a EF-measure.

摘要

字母表自动化不足可能会错误地影响诵读困难者或不熟悉拉丁字母表的人在连线测验中的表现。我们分析了在测验纸上书写字母表是否会改变这些风险群体的表现,以及字母表支持是否会降低任务转换的复杂性。170名接受神经心理学评估的患者参与了研究,他们同时接受了提供字母表支持的连线测验版本和Delis-Kaplan执行功能系统(D-KEFS)连线测验。D-KEFS子任务中仅在数字之间依次画线与仅在字母之间画线的任务之间的差异,被用来衡量字母表自动化不足。诵读困难组以及使用其他字母表学习阅读的人,其差异得分均高于其余样本。回归分析表明,在提供字母表支持时,差异得分在控制年龄和速度后解释了3.4%的方差变异。D-KEFS转换任务的相应百分比为1 7.5%。研究结果表明,字母表支持减轻了非自动化的影响。连线测验B部分(不计时)与连线测验A部分的比率得分与不使用字母表支持时的结果相当,这表明字母表支持并未影响该测验作为执行功能测量工具的有效性。

相似文献

1
Offering alphabet support in the Trail Making Test: Increasing validity for participants with insufficient automatization of the alphabet.在连线测验中提供字母支持:提高字母自动化不足的参与者的效度。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Jul-Aug;29(4):478-485. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1774377. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Improving validity of the trail making test with alphabet support.借助字母辅助提高连线测验的效度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 27;14:1227578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227578. eCollection 2023.
3
D-KEFS trail making test as an embedded performance validity measure.D-KEFS 连线测验作为一种嵌入式的绩效有效性测量工具。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022 Feb;44(1):62-72. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2073334. Epub 2022 May 22.
4
Normative adjustments to the D-KEFS trail making test: corrections for education and vocabulary level.D-KEFS 连线测试的常模调整:教育和词汇水平的校正。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;25(8):1331-44. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.609838. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
5
Alternative type of the trail making test in nonnative English-speakers: the trail making test-black & white.非英语母语者的连线测验替代类型:黑白连线测验。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 13;9(2):e89078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089078. eCollection 2014.
6
Trail making test, part B as a measure of executive control: validation using a set-switching paradigm.作为执行控制测量指标的连线测验B部分:使用任务转换范式进行效度验证
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Aug;22(4):518-28. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;FT518.
7
Regression-based normative data and equivalent scores for Trail Making Test (TMT): an updated Italian normative study.基于回归的 Trail Making Test(TMT)常模数据和等效分数:一项更新的意大利常模研究。
Neurol Sci. 2019 Mar;40(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3673-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
8
Intermanual and alternate-form equivalence on the trail making tests.连线测验中的双手操作与复本等效性。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Feb;20(1):107-10. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.1.107.1487.
9
Components of executive function model regional prefrontal volumes.执行功能模型区域前额叶体积的组成部分。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Oct;33(7):1007-1019. doi: 10.1037/neu0000563. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
10
The D-KEFS Trails as performance validity tests.D-KEFS 测验作为效度量表。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Aug;30(8):1082-1095. doi: 10.1037/pas0000561. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving validity of the trail making test with alphabet support.借助字母辅助提高连线测验的效度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 27;14:1227578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227578. eCollection 2023.
2
Cognitive and Academic Skills in Two Developmental Cohorts of Different Ability Level: A Mutualistic Network Perspective.不同能力水平的两个发展队列中的认知和学术技能:共生网络视角
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2022 Jun;11(2):209-217. doi: 10.1037/h0101870. Epub 2021 Nov 8.