Wong Jolene Si Min, Tan Grace Hwei Ching, Chia Claramae Shulyn, Ong Chin-Ann Johnny, Teo Melissa Ching Ching
Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May 27;12(5):247-258. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i5.247.
Lateral pelvic lymph node (LLN) metastasis (LLNM) occur in up to 28% of patients with low rectal tumours. While prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) has been abandoned by most western institutions in the era of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT), the role of selective LLND in patients with enlarged LLN on pre-CRT imaging remains unclear. Some studies have shown improved survival and recurrence outcomes when LLNs show "response" to CRT. However, no management algorithm exists to differentiate treatment for "responders" "non-responders".
To determine if selective LLND in patients with enlarged LLNs results in improved survival and recurrence outcomes.
A systemic search of PubMed and Embase databases for studies reporting on patients with synchronous radiologically suspicious LLNM (s-LLNM) in rectal cancer receiving preoperative-CRT was performed.
Fifteen retrospective, single-centre studies were included. 793 patients with s-LLNM were evaluated: 456 underwent TME while 337 underwent TME with LLND post-CRT. In the TME group, local recurrence (LR) rates range from 12.5% to 36%. Five-year disease free survival (DFS) was 42% to 75%. In the TME with LLND group, LR rates were 0% to 6%. Five years DFS was 41.2% to 100%. Radiological response was seen in 58%. Pathologically positive LLN was found in up to 94% of non-responders 0% to 20% in responders. Young age, low tumour location and radiological non-response were associated with final positive LLNM and lowered DFS.
LLND is associated with local control in patients with s-LLNM. It can be performed in radiological non-responders given a large majority represent true LLNM. Its role in radiological responders should be considered in selected high risk patients.
低位直肠癌患者中,盆腔外侧淋巴结(LLN)转移(LLNM)发生率高达28%。在新辅助放化疗(CRT)时代,大多数西方机构已不再采用预防性盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术(LLND),但对于CRT前影像学检查显示LLN肿大的患者,选择性LLND的作用仍不明确。一些研究表明,当LLN对CRT出现“反应”时,患者的生存率和复发情况有所改善。然而,目前尚无管理算法来区分“反应者”和“无反应者”的治疗方法。
确定对LLN肿大的患者进行选择性LLND是否能改善生存率和复发情况。
对PubMed和Embase数据库进行系统检索,以查找报告直肠癌患者术前接受CRT且同步存在放射学可疑LLNM(s-LLNM)的研究。
纳入了15项回顾性单中心研究。对793例s-LLNM患者进行了评估:456例行全直肠系膜切除术(TME),337例行CRT后TME联合LLND。在TME组中,局部复发(LR)率为12.5%至36%。五年无病生存率(DFS)为42%至75%。在TME联合LLND组中,LR率为0%至6%。五年DFS为41.2%至100%。58%出现放射学反应。在无反应者中,高达94%的患者病理检查LLN为阳性,而反应者中这一比例为0%至20%。年轻、肿瘤位置低和放射学无反应与最终LLNM阳性及DFS降低相关。
LLND与s-LLNM患者的局部控制相关。鉴于大多数放射学无反应者代表真正的LLNM,可对其进行LLND。对于部分高危患者,应考虑其在放射学反应者中的作用。