Ogura Atsushi, Akiyoshi Takashi, Nagasaki Toshiya, Konishi Tsuyoshi, Fujimoto Yoshiya, Nagayama Satoshi, Fukunaga Yosuke, Ueno Masashi, Kuroyanagi Hiroya
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):868-875. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3762-0.
The feasibility of additional lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is controversial, especially in laparoscopic surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of adding laparoscopic LPLND to TME in patients with advanced lower rectal cancer and swollen LPLNs treated with preoperative CRT.
We reviewed 327 patients with lower rectal cancer without distant metastasis who underwent preoperative CRT followed by laparoscopic TME. Laparoscopic LPLND was added in patients with swollen LPLNs before CRT. Outcomes were compared between patients with (n = 107) and without (n = 220) LPLND.
LPLN metastasis was found in 26 patients (24.3 %) in the LPLND group. The operation time was significantly longer, and total blood loss was significantly greater in the LPLND than TME group (461 vs. 298 min and 115 vs. 30 mL, respectively; P < 0.0001). The major complication rate was similar in the LPLND and TME groups (9.3 vs. 5.5 %, respectively; P = 0.188), and there were no conversions to open surgery. The LPLND and TME groups also showed a similar 3-year relapse-free survival rate (84.7 vs. 82.0 %, respectively; P = 0.536) and local recurrence rate (3.2 vs. 5.2 %, respectively; P = 0.569) despite significantly more patients with pathological lymph node metastasis in the LPLND than TME group (37.4 vs. 22.3 %, respectively; P < 0.0001).
Additional laparoscopic LPLND is feasible in patients with advanced lower rectal cancer and clinically swollen LPLNs treated with preoperative CRT, with no significant increase in major complications compared with TME alone.
对于接受术前放化疗(CRT)的患者,与单纯全直肠系膜切除术(TME)相比,额外进行侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPLND)的可行性存在争议,尤其是在腹腔镜手术中。本研究旨在评估在术前接受CRT治疗且侧方盆腔淋巴结肿大的晚期低位直肠癌患者中,在TME基础上增加腹腔镜LPLND的可行性。
我们回顾了327例无远处转移的低位直肠癌患者,这些患者接受了术前CRT,随后进行了腹腔镜TME。对于术前CRT前侧方盆腔淋巴结肿大的患者增加了腹腔镜LPLND。比较了接受LPLND的患者(n = 107)和未接受LPLND的患者(n = 220)的结局。
LPLND组有26例患者(24.3%)发现侧方盆腔淋巴结转移。LPLND组的手术时间明显更长,总失血量明显多于TME组(分别为461 vs. 298分钟和115 vs. 30毫升;P < 0.0001)。LPLND组和TME组的主要并发症发生率相似(分别为9.3% vs. 5.5%;P = 0.188),且均未转为开放手术。尽管LPLND组病理淋巴结转移的患者明显多于TME组(分别为37.4% vs. 22.3%;P < 0.0001),但LPLND组和TME组的3年无复发生存率(分别为84.7% vs. 82.0%;P = 0.536)和局部复发率(分别为3.2% vs. 5.2%;P = 0.569)相似。
对于术前接受CRT治疗且临床侧方盆腔淋巴结肿大的晚期低位直肠癌患者,额外进行腹腔镜LPLND是可行的,与单纯TME相比,主要并发症无显著增加。