Suppr超能文献

常规术后血红蛋白评估对预测微创根治性前列腺切除术患者的输血需求效果不佳。

Routine Postoperative Hemoglobin Assessment Poorly PredictsTransfusion Requirement among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Chesnut Gregory T, Benfante Nicole, Barham David, Dean Lucas W, Tin Amy, Sjoberg Daniel D, Scardino Peter T, Eastham James A, Ehdaie Behfar, Coleman Jonathan A, Donahue Timothy F, Touijer Karim A, Laudone Vincent P

机构信息

Urology Service, Department of Surgery (GTC, NB, DB, LWD, PTS, JAE, BE, JAC, TFD, KAT, VPL), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (AT, DDS), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Urol Pract. 2020 Jul;7(4):299-304. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000108.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An advantage of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy over open surgery is decreased blood loss. At our institution hemoglobin is routinely checked 4 and 14 hours postoperatively. We assessed the relevance of this practice in a contemporary cohort undergoing minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic radical prostatectomy at our institution between January 2010 and September 2018. We identified 3,631 patients with preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values, and assessed the role of routine hemoglobin assessment in determining need for transfusion within 30 days. Medicare reimbursement rates for 2019 were used for cost analysis.

RESULTS

Of 3,631 patients in our cohort 44 (1.2%) required transfusion. At 4 hours following surgery the median hemoglobin decrease was 8.0% (IQR 4.8 to 11.4) for patients who did not receive transfusion and 12.5% (9.5 to 19.2) for those who received transfusion. At 14 hours the median decrease was 14.2% (IQR 10.0 to 18.4) vs 33.1% (22.6 to 38.6). Routine hemoglobin assessment had no role in the decision to transfuse in 18 patients (41%). No patient was transfused based on 4-hour values alone. Omitting 1 hemoglobin assessment could have resulted in institutional savings of $37,000 during this period.

CONCLUSIONS

As transfusion following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy is rare, scheduled postoperative hemoglobin assessments in the absence of symptoms are unnecessary to recognize bleeding events. The largest hemoglobin difference between men who did vs did not receive transfusion was seen at 14 hours postoperatively. Thus, this single hemoglobin evaluation is sufficient.

摘要

引言

与开放手术相比,微创根治性前列腺切除术的一个优势是失血量减少。在我们机构,术后4小时和14小时常规检查血红蛋白。我们评估了这种做法在当代接受微创根治性前列腺切除术队列中的相关性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2010年1月至2018年9月在我们机构接受腹腔镜或机器人根治性前列腺切除术患者的数据。我们确定了3631例有术前和术后血红蛋白值的患者,并评估了常规血红蛋白评估在确定30天内输血需求中的作用。使用2019年医疗保险报销率进行成本分析。

结果

我们队列中的3631例患者中,44例(1.2%)需要输血。未接受输血的患者术后4小时血红蛋白中位数下降8.0%(四分位间距4.8至11.4),接受输血的患者为12.5%(9.5至19.2)。术后14小时,中位数下降分别为14.2%(四分位间距10.0至18.4)和33.1%(22.6至38.6)。常规血红蛋白评估对18例患者(41%)的输血决策没有作用。没有患者仅根据4小时的值接受输血。在此期间,省略1次血红蛋白评估可使机构节省37,000美元。

结论

由于微创根治性前列腺切除术后输血很少见,在无症状的情况下安排术后血红蛋白评估对于识别出血事件是不必要的。接受输血和未接受输血的男性之间最大的血红蛋白差异出现在术后14小时。因此,这一次血红蛋白评估就足够了。

相似文献

2
Screening Postoperative Hemoglobin after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy-Frequently Used, but Is It Necessary?
Urol Pract. 2020 Nov;7(6):554-558. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000121. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

9
Preoperative Laboratory Testing.术前实验室检查
Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Mar;34(1):43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.10.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验