Department of Psychology.
Center for Anxiety and Traumatic Stress Disorders.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Aug;129(6):543. doi: 10.1037/abn0000631. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Reports an error in "Identity confusion in complicated grief: A closer look" by Benjamin W. Bellet, Nicole J. LeBlanc, Marie-Christine Nizzi, Mikaela L. Carter, Florentine H. S. van der Does, Jacqueline Peters, Donald J. Robinaugh and Richard J. McNally (, 2020[May], Vol 129[4], 397-407). In the original article, the following acknowledgment of funding was missing from the author note: "Donald J. Robinaugh's work on this article was supported by federal funding from the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant 1K23MH113805-01A1; principal investigator: Donald J. Robinaugh)." The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-23551-001). Complicated grief (CG) is characterized by a wide range of symptoms, including identity confusion or a sense that a part of oneself has died with the decedent. Although identity confusion is a commonly reported feature of CG, little is known about which specific aspects of self-concept are compromised. In the current study, we used qualitative coding methods to investigate which aspects of the sense of self differed between those with and without CG in a sample of 77 bereaved adults. Relative to individuals without CG, those with CG provided fewer descriptors of their self-concept overall (lower self-fluency), provided sets of descriptors that consisted of fewer categories (lower self-diversity), and had lower proportions of self-relevant preferences and activities. However, group differences were not observed for proportions of any other categories of self-concept descriptors, including references to the loss, the past, or distress-related self-statements. Directions for future research and clinical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了本杰明·W·贝尔特(Benjamin W. Bellet)、妮可·J·勒布朗(Nicole J. LeBlanc)、玛丽-克里斯汀·尼齐(Marie-Christine Nizzi)、米凯拉·L·卡特(Mikaela L. Carter)、佛罗伦萨·H·S·范德多斯(Florentine H. S. van der Does)、杰奎琳·彼得斯(Jacqueline Peters)、唐纳德·J·罗宾诺(Donald J. Robinaugh)和理查德·J·麦克纳利(Richard J. McNally)发表的“复杂悲伤中的身份混淆:更深入的研究”(2020 年 5 月,第 129 卷,第 397-407 页)中的错误。在原始文章中,作者注释中缺少对以下资助的确认:“唐纳德·J·罗宾诺(Donald J. Robinaugh)在这项研究中的工作得到了国家心理健康研究所的联邦资助(资助号:1K23MH113805-01A1;主要研究者:唐纳德·J·罗宾诺)。”本文的在线版本已更正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录 2020-23551-001 中)。复杂悲伤(CG)的特征是症状广泛,包括身份混淆或感觉自己的一部分与死者一起死亡。尽管身份混淆是 CG 的常见特征,但人们对自我概念的哪些特定方面受到影响知之甚少。在当前的研究中,我们使用定性编码方法在 77 名丧亲的成年人样本中调查了 CG 患者与非 CG 患者之间自我意识的哪些方面存在差异。与没有 CG 的个体相比,CG 患者的自我概念总体上的描述较少(自我流畅性较低),提供的描述集类别较少(自我多样性较低),与自我相关的偏好和活动的比例较低。但是,在任何其他自我概念描述符类别的比例上,都没有观察到组间差异,包括对损失、过去或与痛苦相关的自我陈述的提及。讨论了未来研究的方向和临床意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。