Suppr超能文献

采用虚构自传:捏造膨胀还是紧缩?

Adopting a fictitious autobiography: fabrication inflation or deflation?

机构信息

Leuven Institute of Criminology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Section Forensic Psychology Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Memory. 2020 Jul;28(6):741-752. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1771371. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Abstract

In the present experiment, we examined whether adopting a fictitious biography would make participants believe in this autobiography. Participants were split up into two conditions: forced confabulation condition and control condition. The forced confabulation condition received a snippet with the fake biography and had to adopt it through several methods (i.e., method acting, journaling, and convincing experimenters in an interview) over an extended period of time. The control condition was told that they partook in an experiment about personal childhood memories. Before, during and after lying participants completed four Life Event Inventories (LEI). Results revealed that after coming forward with the truth participants did not increase nor decrease their belief for the lied about events. Additionally, even after a one-year delay, we found no evidence for either effect. Our findings suggest that more extreme forms of fabrication do not make people believe in their lies.

摘要

在本实验中,我们考察了采用虚构传记是否会使参与者相信这份自传。参与者被分为两个条件:强制虚构条件和控制条件。强制虚构条件收到了一段带有虚假传记的片段,并通过多种方法(即角色扮演、写日记和在面试中说服实验者)在一段时间内采用它。控制条件被告知他们参与了一个关于个人童年记忆的实验。在说谎者完成四项生活事件问卷(LEI)之前、期间和之后。结果表明,在说出真相后,参与者并没有增加或减少他们对所陈述事件的信任。此外,即使延迟了一年,我们也没有发现任何这两种效果的证据。我们的研究结果表明,更极端的编造形式并不能使人们相信他们的谎言。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验