Chaudhary Dhanjee Kumar, Palei Sanjay Kumar, Kumar Vivekanand, Karmakar Netai Chandra
Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), India.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):174-183. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1785154. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
Two groups of heavy earthmoving equipment operators, transport equipment (dumper) operators and non-transport equipment (drill and shovel) operators, in coal mines are assessed comparatively for their vibration magnitude and possible health consequences. Whole-body vibration exposure measurements were recorded according to Standard No. ISO 2631-1. Measurements were carried out at the operator-seat interface with a tri-axial seat pad accelerometer using a vibration analyser, followed by a questionnaire survey. The binary logistic regression model was used to comparatively assess the two groups of operators. . The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of lower back pain is 4.06 times greater (95% confidence interval [1.36, 12.08]) in transport equipment operators compared to non-transport operators. The daily vibration dose value of the transport equipment operators was 2.92 times greater than their counterparts (95% confidence interval [0.94, 9.09]). However, non-transport equipment operators belonging to the high driving experience category presented a value 5.26 times higher than the transport equipment operators. Transport equipment operators are more vulnerable to vibration hazards than their counterparts, as is evident from the vibration magnitude as well as from the symptoms of lower back pain.
对煤矿中的两组重型土方设备操作员、运输设备(自卸车)操作员和非运输设备(钻机和铲子)操作员的振动强度及可能产生的健康后果进行了比较评估。根据ISO 2631-1标准记录全身振动暴露测量值。使用振动分析仪,通过三轴座椅垫加速度计在操作员座椅界面进行测量,随后进行问卷调查。采用二元逻辑回归模型对两组操作员进行比较评估。二元逻辑回归分析显示,与非运输设备操作员相比,运输设备操作员患下背痛的风险高4.06倍(95%置信区间[1.36, 12.08])。运输设备操作员的每日振动剂量值比非运输设备操作员高2.92倍(95%置信区间[0.94, 9.09])。然而,具有高驾驶经验的非运输设备操作员的该值比运输设备操作员高5.26倍。从振动强度以及下背痛症状可以明显看出,运输设备操作员比非运输设备操作员更容易受到振动危害。