Suppr超能文献

不同粒径颗粒物与全因及特定病因急救车出动的关系。

Relationship between different particle size fractions and all-cause and cause-specific emergency ambulance dispatches.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Methodology (CCEM), Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Environ Health. 2020 Jun 17;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00619-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the relationship between different particle size fractions and emergency ambulance dispatches (EAD) remains limited and sparse.

METHODS

We collected daily data of EAD, ambient air pollution and meteorological data from 2014 to 2018 in Guangzhou, China. We used a generalized additive model with covariate adjustments to estimate the associations between different particle size fractions and EAD related to all-cause, cardiovascular diseases, and respiratory diseases. Several subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Significant associations were observed between PM, PM, PM and EADs. A 10 μg/m increase of PM PM, and PM was associated with an increase of 0.98% (95% CI: 0.67, 1.28%), 2.06% (95% CI: 1.44, 2.68%), and 0.75% (95%CI: 0.53, 0.96%) in all-cause EAD, with an increase of 0.69% (95% CI: 0.00, 1.39%), 2.04% (95% CI: 0.64, 3.45%), and 0.60% (95%CI: 0.11,1.10%) in cardiovascular-related EAD, and an increase of 1.14% (95% CI: 0.25, 2.04%), 2.52% (95% CI: 0.72, 4.35%), and 0.89% (95%CI: 0.25,1.52%) in respiratory-related EAD at lag03, respectively. The results were robust in subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that PM, PM and PM were significantly related with risks of all-cause and cause-specific EAD. More evidence of high quality may be needed to further support our results in this ecological study.

摘要

背景

不同粒径颗粒物与急救车出动(EAD)之间的关系的证据仍然有限且稀少。

方法

我们收集了 2014 年至 2018 年中国广州的每日 EAD、环境空气污染和气象数据。我们使用具有协变量调整的广义加性模型来估计不同粒径颗粒物与全因、心血管疾病和呼吸系统疾病相关的 EAD 之间的关联。还进行了几项亚组和敏感性分析。

结果

观察到 PM、PM、PM 和 EAD 之间存在显著关联。PM、PM 和 PM 每增加 10μg/m,全因 EAD 增加 0.98%(95%CI:0.67,1.28%)、2.06%(95%CI:1.44,2.68%)和 0.75%(95%CI:0.53,0.96%),心血管相关 EAD 增加 0.69%(95%CI:0.00,1.39%)、2.04%(95%CI:0.64,3.45%)和 0.60%(95%CI:0.11,1.10%),呼吸系统相关 EAD 增加 1.14%(95%CI:0.25,2.04%)、2.52%(95%CI:0.72,4.35%)和 0.89%(95%CI:0.25,1.52%),分别在 lag03。结果在亚组和敏感性分析中具有稳健性。

结论

本研究表明,PM、PM 和 PM 与全因和病因特异性 EAD 的风险显著相关。在这项生态学研究中,可能需要更多高质量的证据来进一步支持我们的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77f1/7301562/6c07bf77eb95/12940_2020_619_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验