Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 17;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01004-z.
National audit is a key strategy used to improve care for patients with dementia. Audit and feedback has been shown to be effective, but with variation in how much it improves care. Both evidence and theory identify active ingredients associated with effectiveness of audit and feedback. It is unclear to what extent national audit is consistent with evidence- and theory-based audit and feedback best practice.
We explored how the national audit of dementia is undertaken in order to identify opportunities to enhance its impact upon the improvement of care for people with dementia. We undertook a multi-method qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia at six hospitals within four diverse English National Health Service organisations. Inductive framework analysis of 32 semi-structured interviews, documentary analysis (n = 39) and 44 h of observations (n = 36) was undertaken. Findings were presented iteratively to a stakeholder group until a stable description of the audit and feedback process was produced.
Each organisation invested considerable resources in the audit. The audit results were dependent upon the interpretation by case note reviewers who extracted the data. The national report was read by a small number of people in each organisation, who translated it into an internal report and action plan. The internal report was presented at specialty- and organisation-level committees. The internal report did not include information that was important to how committee members collectively decided whether and how to improve performance. Participants reported that the national audit findings may not reach clinicians who were not part of the specialty or organisation-level committees.
There is considerable organisational commitment to the national audit of dementia. We describe potential evidence- and theory-informed enhancements to the enactment of the audit to improve the local response to performance feedback in the national audit. The enhancements relate to the content and delivery of the feedback from the national audit provider, support for the clinicians leading the organisational response to the feedback, and the feedback provided within the organisation.
国家审计是改善痴呆症患者护理的关键策略。审计和反馈已被证明是有效的,但在改善护理的程度上存在差异。证据和理论都确定了与审计和反馈有效性相关的有效成分。目前尚不清楚国家审计在多大程度上符合基于证据和理论的最佳审计和反馈实践。
我们探讨了国家痴呆症审计是如何进行的,以确定增强其对改善痴呆症患者护理的影响的机会。我们在四个不同的英国国家医疗服务体系组织的六家医院中对国家痴呆症审计进行了多方法定性探索。对 32 次半结构化访谈、文件分析(n=39)和 44 小时观察(n=36)进行了归纳框架分析。研究结果被反复呈现给利益相关者小组,直到产生对审计和反馈过程的稳定描述。
每个组织都投入了大量资源进行审计。审计结果取决于病例记录审查员的解释,他们提取了数据。国家报告在每个组织中只有少数人阅读,他们将其转化为内部报告和行动计划。内部报告在专业和组织层面的委员会上提出。内部报告没有包含对委员会成员集体决定是否以及如何改进绩效非常重要的信息。参与者报告说,国家审计结果可能无法传达给未参加专业或组织层面委员会的临床医生。
国家痴呆症审计得到了相当大的组织承诺。我们描述了潜在的基于证据和理论的增强措施,以改善对国家审计中绩效反馈的本地响应。这些增强措施涉及国家审计提供者提供反馈的内容和方式、为领导组织对反馈做出响应的临床医生提供支持,以及在组织内提供反馈。