Suppr超能文献

体重评估和初级保健中的体重管理建议:对英国全科医生和执业护士自我报告实践的横断面调查。

Weight assessment and the provision of weight management advice in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of self-reported practice among general practitioners and practice nurses in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

Cancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK.

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 19;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01184-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although primary care settings provide a large-scale and high-reach opportunity for weight management and obesity prevention, the proportion of adults in the United Kingdom (UK) who report receiving weight management advice is limited. This study examines the self-reported frequency of assessing weight and providing weight management advice by General Practitioners (GPs) and Practice Nurses (PNs) working in primary care in the UK, and differences by practitioner characteristics.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey with GPs and PNs in the UK (n = 2020), conducted January-March 2017. A mock consultation exercise assessed what factors led to calculating a patient's Body Mass Index (BMI) and whether weight management advice was given after determining the patient had an obese BMI. For all patients, practitioners were asked how often they calculated BMI, how often they gave weight management advice to patients with an obese BMI, and how often they utilised different advice or referral options (each: Always/Often vs. Less often/Never). Binary logistic regressions examined whether frequency of assessing weight and providing advice was associated with practitioner characteristics.

RESULTS

In the mock consultation, physical cues (40%) were most likely to prompt calculation of BMI, and half of practitioners (56%) provided weight management advice after determining the patient had an obese BMI, with GPs less likely to do so than PNs (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75). Half of practitioners (58%) said they calculated the BMI of all patients Always/Often, with GPs less likely to do so than PNs (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21-0.34). Three quarters (78%) said they provided weight management advice to patients with an obese BMI Always/Often, with GPs less likely to do so than PNs (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47-0.85). Weight management advice was provided more frequently than referrals, particularly suggesting increased physical activity (93%) and diet modification (89%).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous research, the findings suggest that opportunities to provide weight management advice in primary care, including to patients with an obese BMI, are potentially missed. Future research should test alternative mechanisms to increase weight assessment and advice provision, examine the effectiveness of advice frequently given, and seek solutions to reported barriers for providing weight management advice.

摘要

背景

尽管初级保健机构为体重管理和肥胖预防提供了大规模和高覆盖的机会,但英国(UK)报告接受体重管理建议的成年人比例有限。本研究调查了在英国初级保健机构工作的全科医生(GPs)和执业护士(PNs)自我报告的评估体重和提供体重管理建议的频率,并按从业者特征进行了差异分析。

方法

2017 年 1 月至 3 月,对英国的 GPs 和 PNs 进行了横断面调查(n=2020)。模拟咨询练习评估了导致计算患者体重指数(BMI)的因素,以及在确定患者 BMI 肥胖后是否给予体重管理建议。对于所有患者,医生都被问到他们计算 BMI 的频率、给 BMI 肥胖患者提供体重管理建议的频率,以及他们使用不同的建议或转诊选择的频率(每项:总是/经常 vs. 较少/从不)。二元逻辑回归分析了评估体重和提供建议的频率是否与从业者特征相关。

结果

在模拟咨询中,身体线索(40%)最有可能提示计算 BMI,一半的从业者(56%)在确定患者 BMI 肥胖后提供体重管理建议,而全科医生提供建议的可能性低于执业护士(优势比[OR] = 0.59,95%置信区间:0.47-0.75)。一半的从业者(58%)表示他们总是/经常计算所有患者的 BMI,全科医生的可能性低于执业护士(OR = 0.27,95%置信区间:0.21-0.34)。四分之三(78%)的从业者表示他们总是/经常向 BMI 肥胖的患者提供体重管理建议,全科医生的可能性低于执业护士(OR = 0.63,95%置信区间:0.47-0.85)。体重管理建议的提供频率高于转诊,特别是建议增加体力活动(93%)和饮食调整(89%)。

结论

与先前的研究一致,这些发现表明,初级保健中提供体重管理建议的机会,包括向 BMI 肥胖的患者提供建议,可能被错失。未来的研究应该测试增加体重评估和建议提供的替代机制,检查经常提供的建议的有效性,并寻找解决提供体重管理建议的报告障碍的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Moral discourse in general practitioners' accounts of obesity communication.全科医生肥胖沟通叙述中的道德话语。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jun;230:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Mar 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验