Suppr超能文献

抗维生素 K 口服抗凝剂对骨骼和心血管健康的影响。

Effects of Anti-vitamin k oral anticoagulants on bone and cardiovascular health.

机构信息

Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Modena, Italy.

Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Sep;79:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Abstract

Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (VKAs) have been proven over 50 years to be highly effective and acceptably safe in many settings and are still used by millions of people worldwide. The main concern about the safety of VKAs regards the risk of bleeding, but there is accumulation evidence of their potentially negative effects beyond hemostasis. Indeed, VKAs impair the action of several Vitamin-K Dependent Proteins (VKDP), such as Bone Gla protein, Matrix Gla protein, Gas6 Protein, Periostin and Gla-Ric Protein, involved in bone and vascular metabolism, thus exerting a detrimental effect on bone and vascular health. Indeed, although the evidence regarding this issue is not compelling, it has been shown that VKAs use decreases bone mass density, increases the risk of bone fractures and accelerates the process of vascular and valvular calcification. Vascular calcification is a major concern in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients, also in absence of VKAs, because of mineral metabolism derangement, chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. Direct Oral AntiCoagulants (DOACs) do not affect VKDP involved in vascular and valvular calcification, and do not induce calcific valve degeneration in animal models, being a possible alternative to AVK for CKD patients. However, the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this population, suggested by some recent observations, requires confirmation by dedicated, randomized study. We reviewed here the effects of VKAs in bone and vascular health as compared to DOACs, in order to provide the physicians with some data useful to wisely choose the most suitable anticoagulant for every patient.

摘要

维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂 (VKAs) 已被证明在 50 多年的时间里在许多情况下具有高度有效性和可接受的安全性,并且仍被全世界数百万人使用。关于 VKAs 安全性的主要关注点是出血风险,但越来越多的证据表明,它们除了止血之外,还可能产生负面影响。事实上,VKAs 会损害几种维生素 K 依赖性蛋白 (VKDP) 的作用,如骨钙蛋白、基质 Gla 蛋白、Gas6 蛋白、骨膜蛋白和 Gla-Ric 蛋白,这些蛋白参与骨骼和血管代谢,从而对骨骼和血管健康产生不利影响。事实上,尽管关于这个问题的证据并不确凿,但已经表明 VKAs 的使用会降低骨密度,增加骨折风险,并加速血管和瓣膜钙化过程。血管钙化是慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者的一个主要关注点,即使没有 VKAs,由于矿物质代谢紊乱、慢性炎症和氧化应激,也会导致血管钙化。直接口服抗凝剂 (DOACs) 不会影响参与血管和瓣膜钙化的 VKDP,并且不会在动物模型中诱导钙化瓣膜退化,因此可能是 CKD 患者替代 AVK 的一种选择。然而,一些最近的观察结果表明 DOACs 在该人群中的疗效和安全性需要通过专门的随机研究来证实。我们在这里回顾了 VKAs 在骨骼和血管健康方面的作用与 DOACs 的比较,以便为医生提供一些有用的数据,以便为每位患者明智地选择最合适的抗凝剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验