CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China; Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China; Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, Beijing, PR China.
J Pain. 2020 Nov-Dec;21(11-12):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
Although pain has been shown to affect attentional performance, little is known about the time course of attention interruption after pain stimulus perception. The present study examined the time course of the effects of transient heat pain stimulation on 2 components of attention. Three groups of subjects performed attention tasks under pain, warmth, and no-stimulation control conditions, respectively. The pain and warmth groups received brief physical stimulation. Attention tasks were presented 0 ms, 250 ms, 750 ms, or 1500 ms after the end of stimulation. The 2 attention tasks, namely the spatial cue task (Experiment 1, N = 92) and a Stroop task (Experiment 2, N = 86), were conducted separately. In Experiment 1, attentional orientation of the pain and warmth groups was significantly impaired for at least 1.5 seconds after the physical stimulation had ended. Interestingly, this effect lasted longer for the warmth group than for the pain group. In Experiment 2, pain stimulation had no effect on executive attention at any time. We concluded that attentional orientation is selectively disrupted by both pain and warmth stimuli, but recovers earlier from pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article is concerned with the subsequent interruptive effect of pain on attentional orientation and executive attention by using the spatial cue task and the Stroop task, respectively. These measures offer options for investigating the time course of attention interruption after transient pain stimulation.
尽管疼痛已被证明会影响注意力表现,但人们对疼痛刺激感知后注意力中断的时间进程知之甚少。本研究考察了短暂热痛刺激对注意的两个成分的影响的时间进程。三组受试者分别在疼痛、温暖和无刺激对照条件下进行注意任务。疼痛和温暖组接受短暂的物理刺激。在刺激结束后 0 ms、250 ms、750 ms 或 1500 ms 呈现注意任务。两个注意任务,即空间线索任务(实验 1,N=92)和 Stroop 任务(实验 2,N=86),分别进行。在实验 1 中,疼痛和温暖组在物理刺激结束后至少 1.5 秒内注意力方向明显受损。有趣的是,这种效应在温暖组比疼痛组持续时间更长。在实验 2 中,疼痛刺激在任何时候都不会对执行注意产生影响。我们得出结论,注意力方向会被疼痛和温暖刺激选择性地干扰,但从疼痛中恢复得更早。观点:本文通过空间线索任务和 Stroop 任务,分别关注疼痛对注意力方向和执行注意的后续中断效应。这些措施为研究短暂疼痛刺激后注意力中断的时间进程提供了选择。