The role of sleep laboratory polygraphy in the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in Robin infants.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Currently, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) management in Robin sequence (RS) infants has not been standardized. Sleep laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for OSAS diagnosis, however, access is restricted. This study aimed to compare the respiratory indexes measured in a sleep laboratory using PSG as well as a possible alternative, polygraphy (PG).

PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in a tertiary hospital. PSG performed in RS infants in the sleep laboratory was analysed by a single reviewer. After sleep data removal, anonymized raw data were analysed to obtain only PG data. Respiratory indexes were compared for (i) PSG and PG and (ii) patients with or without OSAS clinical signs.

RESULTS

Among the 20 RS (median [IQR] age: 43 [25-114] days at evaluation), 70% of the patients had OSAS clinical signs but all of them had severe OSAS. The median mixed obstructive apnea hypopnea index was not significantly different between PSG and PG (27/h [18-38] versus 26/h [18-56], p = 0.43). The median obstructive apnea index was higher with no significant difference between PG and PSG (19/h [15-31] versus 7/h [4-25], p = 0.05). The median obstructive hypopnea index was significantly lower on PG than on PSG (2/h [0-3] versus 8/h [8-19], p = 0.01). No difference on PSG or PG was observed for patients with and without clinical signs of OSAS.

CONCLUSION

Although PSG remains the gold standard for OSA evaluation, a PG seems to be a useful alternative to measure OSA in RS infants because of their OSAS severity. This evaluation should be recommended in all RS infants, even in the absence of OSAS clinical signs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.