• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的谵妄严重程度指标:在更好评估疾病(BASIL)研究中的生成和内部验证。

New Delirium Severity Indicators: Generation and Internal Validation in the Better Assessment of Illness (BASIL) Study.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2020;49(1):77-90. doi: 10.1159/000506700. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1159/000506700
PMID:32554974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7484102/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common and preventable geriatric syndrome. Moving beyond the binary classification of delirium present/absent, delirium severity represents a potentially important outcome for evaluating preventive and treatment interventions and tracking the course of patients. Although several delirium severity assessment tools currently exist, most have been developed in the absence of advanced measurement methodology and have not been evaluated with rigorous validation studies.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to report our development of new delirium severity items and the results of item reduction and selection activities guided by psychometric analysis of data derived from a field study.

METHODS

Building on our literature review of delirium instruments and expert panel process to identify domains of delirium severity, we adapted items from existing delirium severity instruments and generated new items. We then fielded these items among a sample of 352 older hospitalized patients.

RESULTS

We used an expert panel process and psychometric data analysis techniques to narrow a set of 303 potential items to 17 items for use in a new delirium severity instrument. The 17-item set demonstrated good internal validity and favorable psychometric characteristics relative to comparator instruments, including the Confusion Assessment Method - Severity (CAM-S) score, the Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98, and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.

CONCLUSION

We more fully conceptualized delirium severity and identified characteristics of an ideal delirium severity instrument. These characteristics include an instrument that is relatively quick to administer, is easy to use by raters with minimal training, and provides a severity rating with good content validity, high internal consistency reliability, and broad domain coverage across delirium symptoms. We anticipate these characteristics to be represented in the subsequent development of our final delirium severity instrument.

摘要

背景

谵妄是一种常见且可预防的老年综合征。超越谵妄存在/不存在的二元分类,谵妄严重程度代表了评估预防和治疗干预措施以及跟踪患者病程的一个潜在重要结果。尽管目前存在几种谵妄严重程度评估工具,但大多数都是在缺乏先进测量方法的情况下开发的,并且没有经过严格的验证研究评估。

目的

我们旨在报告我们开发新的谵妄严重程度项目的情况,并报告根据来自现场研究的数据的心理测量分析进行项目删减和选择活动的结果。

方法

基于我们对谵妄工具的文献回顾和专家小组流程,以确定谵妄严重程度的领域,我们从现有的谵妄严重程度工具中改编了项目,并生成了新的项目。然后,我们在 352 名住院老年患者样本中进行了这些项目的测试。

结果

我们使用专家小组流程和心理测量数据分析技术,将一组 303 个潜在项目缩小到 17 个项目,用于新的谵妄严重程度工具。该 17 项集合表现出良好的内部有效性和相对于比较工具的有利心理测量特征,包括意识混乱评估方法-严重程度(CAM-S)评分、修订后的 98 项谵妄评定量表和纪念谵妄评定量表。

结论

我们更全面地概念化了谵妄严重程度,并确定了理想的谵妄严重程度工具的特征。这些特征包括一个相对快速的评估工具,易于经过最少培训的评估者使用,并且提供具有良好内容效度、高内部一致性可靠性和广泛的谵妄症状领域覆盖范围的严重程度评分。我们预计这些特征将在我们最终的谵妄严重程度工具的后续开发中得到体现。

相似文献

1
New Delirium Severity Indicators: Generation and Internal Validation in the Better Assessment of Illness (BASIL) Study.新的谵妄严重程度指标:在更好评估疾病(BASIL)研究中的生成和内部验证。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2020;49(1):77-90. doi: 10.1159/000506700. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
The measurement of delirium: review of scales.谵妄的测量:量表综述
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003 Fall;17(3):207-24. doi: 10.1891/rtnp.17.3.207.53186.
3
[A review of delirium rating scales].[谵妄评定量表综述]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Feb;35(1):5-14.
4
Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98, MDAS, and CAM-S using item response theory.采用项目反应理论对谵妄严重程度工具进行协调:DRS-R-98、MDAS 和 CAM-S 的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0552-4.
5
The Better Assessment of Illness Study for Delirium Severity: Study Design, Procedures, and Cohort Description.意识模糊评估研究的改进:研究设计、程序和队列描述。
Gerontology. 2019;65(1):20-29. doi: 10.1159/000490386. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
Selecting optimal screening items for delirium: an application of item response theory.选择最优的谵妄筛查项目:项目反应理论的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jan 22;13:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-8.
7
The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 Delirium Severity Scale: A Novel Delirium Severity Instrument for Use in the ICU.重症监护病房谵妄严重程度评估的混乱评估方法-7:一种用于重症监护病房的新型谵妄严重程度评估工具。
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):851-857. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002368.
8
Assessing Delirium Severity in Dementia: Item Development and Psychometric Validation for a Delirium Severity Instrument.评估痴呆患者的谵妄严重程度:谵妄严重程度评估工具的项目开发和心理测量学验证。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2024 Sep;50(9):24-30. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20240809-06. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
9
Reliability and validity of a new measure of severity of delirium.一种新型谵妄严重程度测量方法的信度和效度
Int Psychogeriatr. 1998 Dec;10(4):421-33. doi: 10.1017/s1041610298005493.
10
Brief assessment of delirium subtypes: Psychometric evaluation of the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS)-4 in the intensive care setting.简要评估谵妄亚型:在重症监护环境中使用谵妄运动亚型量表(DMSS)-4 进行心理测量评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Oct;15(5):535-543. doi: 10.1017/S147895151600105X. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Better Assessment of Illness Study (BASIL) II for Delirium Severity: Study Design, Variables, and Methods.用于谵妄严重程度评估的更好评估疾病研究(BASIL)II:研究设计、变量和方法。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2025 May 16:8919887251343604. doi: 10.1177/08919887251343604.
2
The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting.修订版谵妄评定量表(DRS-R98)在重症监护环境中用于谵妄严重程度评估的有效性和适用性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Mar;39(3):240-249. doi: 10.1177/08850666231199986. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
Delirium Item Bank: Utilization to Evaluate and Create Delirium Instruments.谵妄条目库:用于评估和创建谵妄工具的应用。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2022;51(2):110-119. doi: 10.1159/000522522. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Psychometric Properties of a Delirium Severity Score for Older Adults and Association With Hospital and Posthospital Outcomes.老年人谵妄严重程度评分的心理测量特性及其与医院和出院后结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e226129. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6129.
5
Domains of delirium severity in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆的谵妄严重程度领域。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1495-1503. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17624. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative Depression and Plasma Cortisol Levels as Predictors of Delirium after Cardiac Surgery.术前抑郁和血浆皮质醇水平可预测心脏手术后谵妄。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;48(3-4):207-214. doi: 10.1159/000505574. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
An interdisciplinary statement of scientific societies for the advancement of delirium care across Europe (EDA, EANS, EUGMS, COTEC, IPTOP/WCPT).欧洲多个科学学会关于推进全欧洲谵妄护理的跨学科声明(欧洲谵妄协会、欧洲神经病学学会、欧洲全科医学学会、欧洲临床营养与代谢学会、国际物理治疗师协会/世界物理治疗师联合会)
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Sep 11;19(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1264-2.
3
Use of an expert panel to identify domains and indicators of delirium severity.使用专家小组来确定谵妄严重程度的领域和指标。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2565-2578. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02201-0. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Perspectives on the Delirium Experience and Its Burden: Common Themes Among Older Patients, Their Family Caregivers, and Nurses.对谵妄体验及其负担的看法:老年患者、其家庭照顾者和护士的共同主题。
Gerontologist. 2019 Mar 14;59(2):327-337. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx153.
5
Assessment of Instruments for Measurement of Delirium Severity: A Systematic Review.评估谵妄严重程度的工具的评估:系统评价。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):231-239. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6975.
6
Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98, MDAS, and CAM-S using item response theory.采用项目反应理论对谵妄严重程度工具进行协调:DRS-R-98、MDAS 和 CAM-S 的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0552-4.
7
The Better Assessment of Illness Study for Delirium Severity: Study Design, Procedures, and Cohort Description.意识模糊评估研究的改进:研究设计、程序和队列描述。
Gerontology. 2019;65(1):20-29. doi: 10.1159/000490386. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Reduce the burden of dementia now.立即减轻痴呆症负担。
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Jul;14(7):845-847. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.3039. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
9
Development of the Primary Care Quality-Homeless (PCQ-H) instrument: a practical survey of homeless patients' experiences in primary care.初级保健质量-无家可归者(PCQ-H)工具的开发:对无家可归患者初级保健经历的实际调查。
Med Care. 2014 Aug;52(8):734-42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000160.
10
The CAM-S: development and validation of a new scoring system for delirium severity in 2 cohorts.CAM-S:用于 2 个队列中谵妄严重程度的新评分系统的开发和验证。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Apr 15;160(8):526-533. doi: 10.7326/M13-1927.