Suppr超能文献

简要评估谵妄亚型:在重症监护环境中使用谵妄运动亚型量表(DMSS)-4 进行心理测量评估。

Brief assessment of delirium subtypes: Psychometric evaluation of the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS)-4 in the intensive care setting.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy,University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.

Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich,Schlieren,Switzerland.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2017 Oct;15(5):535-543. doi: 10.1017/S147895151600105X. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The management of and prognosis for delirium are affected by its subtype: hypoactive, hyperactive, mixed, and none. The DMSS-4, an abbreviated version of the Delirium Motor Symptom Scale, is a brief instrument for the assessment of delirium subtypes. However, it has not yet been evaluated in an intensive care setting.

METHOD

We performed a prospective/descriptive cohort study in order to determine the internal consistency, reliability, and validity of the relevant items of the DMSS-4 versus the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and the original DMSS in a surgical intensive care setting.

RESULTS

A total of 289 elderly, predominantly male patients were screened for delirium, and 122 were included in our sample. The internal consistency of the DMSS-4 items was excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.92), and between the DMSS-4 and DRS-R-98 the overall concurrent validity was substantial (Cramer's V = 0.67). Within individual motor subtypes, concurrent validity remained at least substantial (Cohen's κ = 0.65-0.81) and sensitivity high (69.8 to 82.2%), in contrast to those of the no-motor subtype, with less validity and sensitivity (κ = 0.28, 22%). Similarly, total concurrent validity between the DMSS-4 and the original DMSS reached perfection (Cramer's V = 0.83), as did agreement between the subtypes (κ = 0.83-0.92), while sensitivity remained high (88.2-100%). Only in those with delirium with no-motor subtype was agreement moderate (κ = 0.56) and sensitivity lower (67%). Specificity was high across all subtypes (91.2-99.1%). The DMSS-4 yielded very sensitive ratings, particularly for hypoactive and hyperactive motor symptoms, and interrater agreement was excellent (Fleiss's κ = 0.83).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

We found the DMSS-4 to be a most reliable and valid brief assessment of delirium in characterizing the subtypes of delirium in an intensive care setting, with increased sensitivity to hypoactive and hyperactive motor alterations.

摘要

目的

谵妄的管理和预后受其亚型的影响:低活动型、高活动型、混合性和非运动型。DMSS-4 是 Delirium Motor Symptom Scale 的缩写版,是一种用于评估谵妄亚型的简短工具。然而,它尚未在重症监护环境中进行评估。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性/描述性队列研究,以确定 DMSS-4 与修订后的 98 版 Delirium Rating Scale(DRS-R-98)和原始 DMSS 的相关项目在外科重症监护环境中的内部一致性、可靠性和有效性。

结果

共对 289 名老年、主要为男性的患者进行了谵妄筛查,其中 122 名患者纳入了我们的样本。DMSS-4 项目的内部一致性非常好(Cronbach's α = 0.92),DMSS-4 与 DRS-R-98 之间的整体同期有效性为实质性(Cramer's V = 0.67)。在各个运动亚型内,同期有效性至少为实质性(Cohen's κ = 0.65-0.81),敏感性高(69.8%至 82.2%),而无运动亚型的同期有效性和敏感性较低(κ = 0.28,22%)。同样,DMSS-4 与原始 DMSS 之间的总同期有效性达到完美(Cramer's V = 0.83),亚型之间的一致性也是如此(κ = 0.83-0.92),敏感性仍然很高(88.2%-100%)。只有在无运动亚型的谵妄患者中,一致性为中度(κ = 0.56),敏感性较低(67%)。所有亚型的特异性均较高(91.2%-99.1%)。DMSS-4 产生了非常敏感的评分,特别是对低活动型和高活动型运动症状,且评分者间的一致性非常好(Fleiss's κ = 0.83)。

结果的意义

我们发现,DMSS-4 是一种非常可靠和有效的工具,可以用于在重症监护环境中对谵妄亚型进行特征描述,对低活动型和高活动型运动改变具有更高的敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验