• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

张力带钢丝固定术对粉碎性和单纯移位性鹰嘴骨折均能提供出色的患者报告长期疗效。

Tension Band Wiring Provides Excellent Patient-Reported Long-Term Results for Both Comminuted and Simple Displaced Olecranon Fractures.

作者信息

Terstappen Afra L E, Joosse Pieter, van Dijke Cornelis F, Mirck Boj, van den Brand Johan G H

机构信息

Departments of Trauma Surgery, and.

Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;34(7):e239-e244. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001728.

DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001728
PMID:32555039
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term functional results of both simple and comminuted olecranon fractures treated with tension band wiring (TBW).

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS & INTERVENTION: Between 2004 and 2014, 178 fractures in 178 patients >16 years of age were treated with TBW for a unilateral olecranon fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Subjective functionality was tested with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).

RESULTS

Fifty percent of our cohort were lost to follow-up leaving 89 for review. A total of 51.7% had a comminuted fracture. Mean follow-up time was 7.1 years. Reoperation rate for implant removal was 84%. The total median DASH score was 0.83. Eighty-five patients (95.5%) were rated excellent using the MEPI score. No significant difference in either score was found between the simple (SF) and the comminuted (CF) group. Median range of motion was flexion/extension: 145/-2 degrees, supination/pronation: 90/90 degrees. No clinically relevant difference in range of motion was found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no relevant differences in either subjective or objective functionality between patients with simple or comminuted olecranon fractures after fixation with TBW. Therefore, TBW seems to be an adequate and justifiable treatment modality for both simple and comminuted olecranon fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

评估采用张力带钢丝固定术(TBW)治疗单纯性和粉碎性鹰嘴骨折的长期功能结果。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

一级创伤中心。

患者与干预措施

2004年至2014年期间,178例16岁以上患者的178处单侧鹰嘴骨折采用TBW治疗。

主要观察指标

采用手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷及梅奥肘关节功能指数(MEPI)测试主观功能。

结果

我们的队列中有50%失访,剩余89例接受复查。共有51.7%为粉碎性骨折。平均随访时间为7.1年。植入物取出的再次手术率为84%。DASH总分中位数为0.83。采用MEPI评分,85例患者(95.5%)评定为优秀。单纯骨折组(SF)和粉碎骨折组(CF)在任何一项评分中均未发现显著差异。中位活动范围为屈曲/伸展:145°/-2°,旋后/旋前:90°/90°。两组之间在活动范围方面未发现临床相关差异。

结论

我们发现,采用TBW固定后,单纯性或粉碎性鹰嘴骨折患者在主观和客观功能方面均无相关差异。因此,对于单纯性和粉碎性鹰嘴骨折,TBW似乎都是一种充分且合理的治疗方式。

证据水平

治疗性四级证据。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅《作者须知》。

相似文献

1
Tension Band Wiring Provides Excellent Patient-Reported Long-Term Results for Both Comminuted and Simple Displaced Olecranon Fractures.张力带钢丝固定术对粉碎性和单纯移位性鹰嘴骨折均能提供出色的患者报告长期疗效。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;34(7):e239-e244. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001728.
2
Comminuted Olecranon Fractures (Mayo IIB): Is Dynamic Tension Band Wiring Enough?粉碎性鹰嘴骨折(梅奥IIB型):动力加压张力带钢丝固定是否足够?
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):96-101. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002474.
3
Treatment of olecranon fractures with 2.4- and 2.7-mm plating techniques.采用2.4毫米和2.7毫米钢板技术治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Jan;29(1):36-43. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000152.
4
Simple and comminuted displaced olecranon fractures: a clinical comparison between tension band wiring and plate fixation techniques.简单粉碎性移位尺骨鹰嘴骨折:张力带钢丝固定与钢板固定技术的临床比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Aug;134(8):1107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2021-9. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
5
Surgical technique in tension band wiring method for selected comminuted olecranon fractures.特定粉碎性鹰嘴骨折张力带钢丝固定法的手术技术
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Feb;30(2):237-242. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02551-y. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
Is Tension Band Wire Fixation Superior to Plate Fixation for Simple Displaced Olecranon Fractures? A Randomized Trial With Median Follow-up of 7.5 Years.张力带钢丝固定优于钢板固定治疗单纯移位性尺骨鹰嘴骨折?一项中位数随访 7.5 年的随机试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):127-133. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002832. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures.对比 Mayo ⅡA型尺骨鹰嘴骨折中张力带钢丝固定与钢板固定的疗效。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(1):85-92. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2021.75812. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Case Series of Comminuted Olecranon Fracture Treated by Plate Fixation; Do We Have to Remove the Plate?钢板固定治疗粉碎性尺骨鹰嘴骨折的病例系列;我们必须取出钢板吗?
Kobe J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 12;64(3):E115-E118.
9
Triceps-reflecting anconeus pedicle approach with double precontoured locking plate fixation is efficient in the treatment of orthopaedic trauma association type C distal humerus fracture.采用双预弯锁定钢板固定的肱三头肌反射性肘肌蒂入路治疗C型肱骨远端骨折合并骨科创伤疗效显著。
Injury. 2016 Oct;47(10):2240-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.036. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
10
More metalwork removals in patients with olecranon fracture treated by tension band wiring than plate fixation-a propensity score matching analysis.张力带钢丝固定治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折患者中金属取出物多于钢板固定-倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 13;22(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04559-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Treatment for Simple Isolated and Displaced Olecranon Fractures: Comparison between Plate and Tension Band Wire Fixation.单纯孤立性移位鹰嘴骨折的手术治疗:钢板与张力带钢丝固定的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 21;13(6):1815. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061815.
2
Individualized 3D-printed navigation template-assisted tension band wiring for olecranon fractures.个体化 3D 打印导航模板辅助张力带钢丝固定治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 5;18(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03892-5.
3
Efficacy and safety of tension band wire versus plate for Mayo II olecranon fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
张力带钢丝与钢板治疗 Mayo II 型尺骨鹰嘴骨折的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 3;17(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03262-7.