文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期，新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

使用硅胶泡沫涂层植入物和纹理植入物进行隆胸的比较临床评估。

Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants.

作者信息

Calaes Ivana Leme de, Motta Marcos Matias, Basso Rafael de Campos, Calderoni Davi Reis, Kharmandayan Paulo

机构信息

Fellow PhD degree, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil. Scientific, intellectual, conception and design of the study; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; technical procedures; statistics analysis; manuscript preparation and writing; final approval.

Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, UNICAMP, Campinas-SP, Brazil. Scientific and intellectual content of the study, technical procedures.

出版信息

Acta Cir Bras. 2020 Jun 5;35(4):e202000407. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007
PMID:32555938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7292626/
Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. METHODS: Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam - Lifesil® - and microtexturized silicone - Lifesil®). The evolution was analyzed in postoperative consultations, with physical examination, photographic documentation and filling in a satisfaction questionnaire, in the postoperative period of one month, four months, one year and then annually, up to a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in presence of rippling, stretch marks, breast ptosis, capsular contracture and quality of scars. There was a higher rate of patients who were very satisfied with the outcome 360 days after surgery in the group receiving silicone foam implants (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: In short time, silicone foam envelope implants proved to be as reliable as textured silicone envelope implants, making them an option for augmentation mammoplasty.

摘要

目的：评估与传统纹理植入物相比，硅酮泡沫植入物是否具有不同的演变模式。 方法：58名女性患者接受了手术。她们被分为两组（硅酮泡沫——Lifesil®——和微纹理硅酮——Lifesil®）。在术后咨询中，通过体格检查、摄影记录并填写满意度问卷，对术后1个月、4个月、1年，然后每年进行分析，最长随访3年。 结果：在波纹、妊娠纹、乳房下垂、包膜挛缩和疤痕质量方面，没有统计学上的显著差异。接受硅酮泡沫植入物的组中，术后360天对结果非常满意的患者比例更高（p = 0.036）。 结论：短期内，硅酮泡沫包膜植入物被证明与纹理硅酮包膜植入物一样可靠，使其成为隆乳术的一种选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/688ed3eeea0c/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/8ab53c8666da/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/89eb06ad9a9b/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/cd4bebb2c6e1/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/df0623d95c01/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/d6a34dd40b3b/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/41d787cad628/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/33b7282c528e/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/26f6ad5e8673/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/688ed3eeea0c/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/8ab53c8666da/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/89eb06ad9a9b/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/cd4bebb2c6e1/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/df0623d95c01/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/d6a34dd40b3b/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/41d787cad628/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/33b7282c528e/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/26f6ad5e8673/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae4/7292626/688ed3eeea0c/1678-2674-acb-35-4-e202000407-gf09.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants.

Acta Cir Bras. 2020-6-5

[2]
Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007

[3]
Eight-Year Safety Data for Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants.

Aesthet Surg J. 2018-2-17

[4]
Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.

Aesthet Surg J. 2008

[5]
Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel.

Aesthet Surg J. 2016-4

[6]
Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011-4-1

[7]
Preliminary 3-Year Evaluation of Experience With SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva Silicone Breast Implants: A Single-Center Experience With 5813 Consecutive Breast Augmentation Cases.

Aesthet Surg J. 2018-5-15

[8]
Histological evaluation of capsules formed by silicon implants coated with polyurethane foam and with a textured surface in rats.

Acta Cir Bras. 2016-12

[9]
[Histological and immunohistochemical investigations with capsular contracture after breast augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants].

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2006-8

[10]
[Breast augmentation: indications, types of prostheses, surgical techniques, complications, results].

Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1999-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Current Risk Estimate of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma in Textured Breast Implants.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019-3

[2]
2019 NCCN Consensus Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).

Aesthet Surg J. 2019-1-31

[3]
Evolving Trends in Textured Implant Use for Cosmetic Augmentation in the United States.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018-12

[4]
Silicone breast implants and the risk of autoimmune/rheumatic disorders: a real-world analysis.

Int J Epidemiol. 2018-12-1

[5]
Autoinflammatory/autoimmunity syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA; Shoenfeld's syndrome): A new flame.

Autoimmun Rev. 2018-10-12

[6]
Breast Implants and the Risk of Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma in the Breast.

JAMA Oncol. 2018-3-1

[7]
Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.

JAMA Surg. 2017-12-1

[8]
Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand: High-Surface-Area Textured Implants Are Associated with Increased Risk.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017-10

[9]
Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (Shoenfeld's syndrome) - An update.

Lupus. 2017-6

[10]
Two hundreds cases of ASIA syndrome following silicone implants: a comparative study of 30 years and a review of current literature.

Immunol Res. 2017-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索