Suppr超能文献

复发性胶质母细胞瘤再干预能否提高生存率?文献中的时间偏倚问题。

Does reintervention improve survival in recurrent glioblastoma? Facing a temporal bias in the literature.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Avda de Córdoba S/N, 28041, Madrid, Spain.

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Aug;162(8):1967-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04432-4. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent intraaxial malignant brain tumour, in which recurrence management is a frequent and demanding issue. Recently, reintervention has emerged as a useful tool for treatment. However, some new evidence has shown that most of the articles published could have overestimated its effects. We aimed to analyse the effect on survival of reintervention considering it as a time-dependent variable and to compare it with classic statistical analysis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study with GBM patients between 2007 and 2017. We compared the overall survival (OS) between reintervention and non-reintervention groups with time-dependent statistical methods (Simon-Makuch and landmarking methods and time-dependent multivariable Cox analysis) and compared them with those obtained with non-dependent time variable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients were included in the analysis and 44 of them were reoperated. The standard analysis with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression of the cohort showed an OS of 22.2 months (95% CI 12.56-16.06) in the reintervention group and 11.8 months (95% CI 9.87-13.67) in the non-reintervention group (p < .001); and an HR 0.649 (95% CI 0.434-0.97 p = .035) for reintervention, demonstrating an increase in OS. However, time-dependent analysis with the Simon-Makuch test and the landmarking method showed that the relationship was not consistent, as this increase in OS was not significant. Moreover, time-dependent multivariable Cox analysis did not show that reintervention improved OS in our cohort (HR 0.997 95% CI 0.976-1.018 p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a temporal bias in the literature that has led to an overestimation of the positive effect of reintervention in recurrent GBM. However, reintervention could still be useful in some selected patients, who should be individualized according to prognostic factors related to the patient, biology of the tumour, and characteristics of surgical procedure.

摘要

背景

胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是最常见的颅内恶性脑肿瘤,其复发管理是一个常见且具有挑战性的问题。最近,再次干预已成为一种有用的治疗工具。然而,一些新的证据表明,发表的大多数文章可能高估了它的效果。我们旨在分析将再次干预视为时间相关变量对生存的影响,并将其与经典统计分析进行比较。

方法

我们对 2007 年至 2017 年间的 GBM 患者进行了回顾性研究。我们使用时间依赖统计方法(Simon-Makuch 和 landmarking 方法和时间依赖多变量 Cox 分析)比较了再次干预组和非再次干预组之间的总生存期(OS),并将其与非依赖时间变量分析的结果进行了比较。

结果

共纳入 183 例患者,其中 44 例再次手术。对队列进行 Kaplan-Meier 和多变量 Cox 回归的标准分析显示,再次干预组的 OS 为 22.2 个月(95%CI 12.56-16.06),非再次干预组为 11.8 个月(95%CI 9.87-13.67)(p<0.001);再次干预的 HR 为 0.649(95%CI 0.434-0.97 p=0.035),表明 OS 增加。然而,Simon-Makuch 检验和 landmarking 方法的时间依赖性分析表明,这种 OS 增加并不一致,因为这并没有显著提高 OS。此外,时间依赖性多变量 Cox 分析并未表明再次干预改善了我们队列的 OS(HR 0.997 95%CI 0.976-1.018 p=0.75)。

结论

文献中存在时间偏差,导致对复发性 GBM 再次干预的积极影响高估。然而,再次干预在一些选定的患者中仍然可能有用,这些患者应根据与患者、肿瘤生物学和手术过程特征相关的预后因素进行个体化治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验