Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.
Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, W1B 3GG, UK.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Sep;162(9):2019-2027. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04448-w. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Midline shift in trauma relates to the severity of head injury. Large craniectomies are thought to help resolve brain shift but can be associated with higher rates of morbidity. This study explores the relationship between craniectomy size and subtemporal decompression for acute subdural haematomas with the resolution of brain compression and outcomes. No systematic study correlating these measures has been reported.
A retrospective study of all adult cases of acute subdural haematomas that presented to a Major Trauma Centre and underwent a primary decompressive craniectomy between June 2008 and August 2013. Data collection included patient demographics and presentation, imaging findings and outcomes. All imaging metrics were measured by two independent trained assessors. Compression was measured as midline shift, brainstem shift and cisternal effacement.
Thirty-six patients with mean age of 36.1 ± 12.5 (range 16-62) were included, with a median follow-up of 23.5 months (range 2.2-109.6). The median craniectomy size was 88.7 cm and the median subtemporal decompression was 15.0 mm. There was significant post-operative resolution of shift as measured by midline shift, brainstem shift and cisternal effacement score (all p < .00001). There was no mortality, and the majority of patients made a good recovery with 82.8% having a Modified Rankin Score of 2 or less. There was no association between craniectomy size or subtemporal decompression and any markers of brain shift or outcome (all R < 0.05).
This study suggests that there is no clear relationship between craniectomy size or extent of subtemporal decompression and resolution of brain shift or outcome. Further studies are needed to assess the relative efficacy of large craniectomies and the role of subtemporal decompression.
创伤性中线移位与颅脑损伤的严重程度有关。大骨瓣开颅术被认为有助于缓解脑移位,但可能与更高的发病率相关。本研究探讨了急性硬膜下血肿行大骨瓣开颅术和颞下入路减压术与脑压迫缓解和预后的关系。尚未有系统研究报道这些措施之间的相关性。
回顾性分析 2008 年 6 月至 2013 年 8 月期间在一家大型创伤中心就诊并接受原发性减压性开颅术的所有急性硬膜下血肿成年患者病例。数据收集包括患者的人口统计学和表现、影像学发现和结果。所有影像学指标均由两名独立的受过培训的评估者进行测量。压迫程度通过中线移位、脑干移位和脑池闭塞来衡量。
纳入 36 例患者,平均年龄 36.1±12.5 岁(范围 16-62 岁),中位随访时间为 23.5 个月(范围 2.2-109.6 个月)。骨瓣切除术的中位数为 88.7cm,颞下入路减压术的中位数为 15.0mm。通过中线移位、脑干移位和脑池闭塞评分,术后移位明显缓解(均 P<.00001)。无死亡病例,大多数患者恢复良好,82.8%的患者改良 Rankin 评分≤2 分。骨瓣切除术大小或颞下入路减压术与任何脑移位或结局标志物之间均无关联(均 R<.05)。
本研究表明,骨瓣切除术大小或颞下入路减压术的范围与脑移位或结局之间没有明确的关系。需要进一步研究来评估大骨瓣开颅术的相对疗效和颞下入路减压术的作用。