Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-5162, USA.
Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, & Evaluative Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2576-2583. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05946-4. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Individuals experiencing homelessness have higher hospitalization and mortality rates compared with the housed. Whether they also experience higher readmission rates, and if readmissions vary by region or cause of hospitalization is unknown.
Evaluate the association of homelessness with readmission rates across multiple US states.
Retrospective analysis of administrative claims PATIENTS: All inpatient hospitalizations in Florida, Massachusetts, and New York from January 2010 to October 2015 MAIN MEASURES: Thirty- and 90-day readmission rates KEY RESULTS: Out of a total of 23,103,125 index hospitalizations, 515,737 were for patients who were identified as homeless at the time of discharge. After adjusting for cause of index hospitalization, state, demographics, and clinical comorbidities, 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were higher for index hospitalizations in the homeless compared with those in the housed group. The difference in 30-day readmission rates between homeless and housed groups was the largest in Florida (30.4% vs. 19.3%; p < 0.001), followed by Massachusetts (23.5% vs. 15.2%; p < 0.001) and New York (15.7% vs. 13.4%; p < 0.001) (combined 17.3% vs. 14.0%; p < 0.001). Among the most common causes of hospitalization, 30-day readmission rates were 4.1 percentage points higher for the homeless group for mental illness, 4.9 percentage points higher for diseases of the circulatory system, and 2.4 percentage points higher for diseases of the digestive system.
After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, homelessness is associated with significantly higher 30- and 90-day readmission rates, with a significant variation across the three states. Interventions to reduce the burden of readmissions among individuals experiencing homelessness are urgently needed. Differences across states point to the potential of certain public policies to impact health outcomes for individuals experiencing homelessness.
与有房者相比,无家可归者的住院率和死亡率更高。他们的再入院率是否更高,以及再入院率是否因地区或住院原因而有所不同,目前尚不清楚。
评估在美国多个州,无家可归与再入院率之间的关联。
回顾性分析行政索赔数据
2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 10 月期间,佛罗里达州、马萨诸塞州和纽约州所有住院患者
30 天和 90 天再入院率
在总共 23103125 例住院患者中,有 515737 例患者在出院时被确定为无家可归者。在调整了指数住院的病因、州、人口统计学和临床合并症后,与有房者相比,无家可归者的 30 天和 90 天再入院率更高。无家可归者与有房者的 30 天再入院率差异在佛罗里达州最大(30.4%比 19.3%;p<0.001),其次是马萨诸塞州(23.5%比 15.2%;p<0.001)和纽约州(15.7%比 13.4%;p<0.001)(合计为 17.3%比 14.0%;p<0.001)。在最常见的住院病因中,精神疾病患者的 30 天再入院率高出无家可归者 4.1 个百分点,循环系统疾病患者高出 4.9 个百分点,消化系统疾病患者高出 2.4 个百分点。
在调整了人口统计学和临床特征后,无家可归与显著更高的 30 天和 90 天再入院率相关,这在三个州之间存在显著差异。急需采取干预措施来降低无家可归者的再入院负担。各州之间的差异表明,某些公共政策有可能对无家可归者的健康结果产生影响。