• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Living with opioids: A qualitative study with patients with chronic low back pain.与阿片类药物共存:一项对慢性腰痛患者的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1118-1128. doi: 10.1111/hex.13089. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
The Role of Environmental Context and Physical Activity in Prescribed Opioid Use and Pain in Daily Life among Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.环境背景和身体活动在慢性下背痛患者日常规定阿片类药物使用和疼痛中的作用。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Jun 30;57(7):541-550. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac080.
3
A qualitative evidence synthesis to explore healthcare professionals' experience of prescribing opioids to adults with chronic non-malignant pain.一项定性证据综合分析,旨在探究医疗保健专业人员为患有慢性非恶性疼痛的成年人开具阿片类药物的经验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Nov 25;18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0663-8.
4
Resisting Prescribed Opioids: A Qualitative Study of Decision Making in Patients Taking Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain.抵制处方阿片类药物:对服用阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛患者决策过程的定性研究
Pain Med. 2016 Apr;17(4):717-27. doi: 10.1111/pme.12921. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
5
Pharmacologic management of chronic low back pain: synthesis of the evidence.慢性下背痛的药物治疗管理:证据综合。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S131-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822f178f.
6
Harms and benefits of opioids for management of non-surgical acute and chronic low back pain: a systematic review.阿片类药物在非手术性急性和慢性下背痛管理中的危害和益处:系统评价。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):664. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099805. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
7
"My life is under control with these medications": an interpretative phenomenological analysis of managing chronic pain with opioids.“这些药物让我的生活处于掌控之中”:对使用阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的阐释现象学分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3055-5.
8
Clinical Inquiry: How effective are opioids for chronic low back pain?临床探究:阿片类药物对慢性下腰痛的疗效如何?
J Fam Pract. 2015 Sep;64(9):584-5.
9
Responsible, Safe, and Effective Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物的合理、安全与有效处方:美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)指南
Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2S):S3-S92.
10
A qualitative study of veterans on long-term opioid analgesics: barriers and facilitators to multimodality pain management.一项关于长期使用阿片类镇痛药退伍军人的定性研究:多模式疼痛管理的障碍与促进因素
Pain Med. 2015 Apr;16(4):726-32. doi: 10.1111/pme.12626. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Explainable AI reveals tissue pathology and psychosocial drivers of opioid prescription for non-specific chronic low back pain.可解释人工智能揭示了非特异性慢性下腰痛阿片类药物处方的组织病理学和社会心理驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 21;15(1):30690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13619-7.
2
'Pain free if I ever will be': lived experience of workers seeking care for pain attributed to musculoskeletal disorders.“如果我能做到,就会无痛”:寻求肌肉骨骼疾病相关疼痛治疗的劳动者的切身体验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 3;25(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07879-z.
3
Patients' perspectives about the role of primary healthcare providers in long-term opioid therapy: a qualitative study in Dutch primary care.患者对初级保健提供者在长期阿片类药物治疗中作用的看法:荷兰初级保健中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 27;74(744):e475-e481. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0547. Print 2024 Jul.
4
Mechanism, application and effect evaluation of nerve mobilization in the treatment of low back pain: A narrative review.神经松动术治疗腰痛的机制、应用及效果评价:叙事性综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34961. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034961.
5
Becoming a secondary actor of one's own life: A qualitative study of the experiences of informal caregivers in the care of people with chronic pain.成为自己生活的次要演员:一项关于非正式照护者在照顾慢性疼痛患者时的体验的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):409-418. doi: 10.1111/hex.13671. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
6
Assessing Pain Research: A Narrative Review of Emerging Pain Methods, Their Technosocial Implications, and Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Approaches.评估疼痛研究:新兴疼痛方法、其技术社会影响及多学科方法机遇的叙述性综述
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 2;3:896276. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.896276. eCollection 2022.
7
Swallowing the pill of adverse effects: A qualitative study of patients' and pharmacists' experiences and decision-making regarding the adverse effects of chronic pain medications.咽下不良反应的“药丸”:一项关于患者和药剂师在慢性疼痛药物不良反应方面的经验和决策的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):394-407. doi: 10.1111/hex.13399. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: New Terminology for a New Era.持续性脊柱疼痛综合征:新时代的新术语。
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 8;14:1627-1630. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S320923. eCollection 2021.
9
Prevalence of Therapeutic use of Opioids in Chronic non-Cancer Pain Patients and Associated Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.慢性非癌痛患者阿片类药物治疗用途的患病率及相关因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Nov 18;11:564412. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.564412. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
"My life is under control with these medications": an interpretative phenomenological analysis of managing chronic pain with opioids.“这些药物让我的生活处于掌控之中”:对使用阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的阐释现象学分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3055-5.
2
Painful lives: Chronic pain experience among people who use illicit drugs in Montreal (Canada).痛苦的生活:蒙特利尔(加拿大)非法使用毒品人群的慢性疼痛体验。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112734. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112734. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
3
The evolution of opioid-related mortality and potential years of life lost in Spain from 2008 to 2017: differences between Spain and the United States.2008 年至 2017 年期间西班牙阿片类药物相关死亡率和潜在寿命损失的演变:西班牙与美国之间的差异。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Feb;36(2):285-291. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1684251. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: protocol of a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.接受和承诺疗法治疗慢性疼痛:系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 14;8(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1044-2.
5
"Like being put on an ice floe and shoved away": A qualitative study of the impacts of opioid-related policy changes on people who take opioids.“就像被放在浮冰上然后被推开”:一项定性研究,探讨阿片类药物相关政策变化对使用阿片类药物者的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Apr;66:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
The Association of Patient Satisfaction-Based Incentives with Primary Care Physician Opioid Prescribing.基于患者满意度的激励措施与初级保健医生阿片类药物处方的关联。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):941-943. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180067.
7
The Pain Divide: a cross-sectional analysis of chronic pain prevalence, pain intensity and opioid utilisation in England.疼痛差异:对英格兰慢性疼痛患病率、疼痛强度和阿片类药物使用情况的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(7):e023391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023391.
8
Long-term outcome of multidisciplinary intervention of chronic non-cancer pain patients in a private setting.私立机构中慢性非癌性疼痛患者多学科干预的长期结果
Scand J Pain. 2012 Apr 1;3(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.10.002.
9
Although unseen, chronic pain is real-A phenomenological study.尽管难以察觉,但慢性疼痛是真实存在的——一项现象学研究。
Scand J Pain. 2015 Jan 1;6(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.04.004.
10
The opioid crisis: a 21st century pain.阿片类药物危机:21世纪的伤痛。
Drugs Today (Barc). 2018 Apr;54(4):283-286. doi: 10.1358/dot.2018.54.4.2812620.

与阿片类药物共存:一项对慢性腰痛患者的定性研究。

Living with opioids: A qualitative study with patients with chronic low back pain.

机构信息

The Observatory of Pain, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.

Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1118-1128. doi: 10.1111/hex.13089. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13089
PMID:32558064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7696128/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioids are one of the most prescribed treatments for chronic pain (CP). However, their long-term use (>3 months) has been surrounded by controversy, due to loss of beneficial effects.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experiences of people with chronic non-malignant low back pain in Spain undergoing long-term treatment with opioids.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted 15 semi-structured interviews at the Pain Clinic with persons taking opioid treatment.

METHODS

The interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis as described by Graneheim and Lundman, and developed categories and themes discussed in light of a biomedicalization framework.

MAIN RESULTS

We developed one overarching theme-Living with opioids: dependence and autonomy while seeking relief-and three categories: The long pathway to opioids due to the invisibility of pain; Opioids: from blind date to a long-term relationship; and What opioids cannot fix.

DISCUSSION

The long and difficult road to find effective treatments was a fundamental part of coping with pain, involving long-term relationships with the health system. This study reflects the benefits, and drawbacks of opioids, along with struggles to maintain autonomy and make decisions while undergoing long-term treatment with opioids. The paper also highlights the consequences of pain in the economy, family and social life of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' experiences should be considered to a greater extent by health-care professionals when giving information about opioids and setting treatment goals. Greater consideration of the social determinants of health that affect CP experiences might lead to more effective solutions to CP.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物是治疗慢性疼痛(CP)的最常用药物之一。然而,由于其疗效丧失,长期使用(>3 个月)一直存在争议。

目的

探索西班牙长期接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性非恶性下腰痛患者的体验。

设计

定性研究。

设置和参与者

我们在疼痛诊所对接受阿片类药物治疗的患者进行了 15 次半结构化访谈。

方法

访谈按照 Graneheim 和 Lundman 描述的定性内容分析进行分析,并根据生物医学化框架讨论了开发的类别和主题。

主要结果

我们提出了一个总体主题——长期使用阿片类药物:依赖和自主同时寻求缓解——以及三个类别:由于疼痛的不可见性导致长期使用阿片类药物;阿片类药物:从盲目约会到长期关系;以及阿片类药物无法解决的问题。

讨论

找到有效治疗方法的漫长而艰难的道路是应对疼痛的一个基本部分,涉及与卫生系统的长期关系。本研究反映了阿片类药物的好处和弊端,以及在长期接受阿片类药物治疗时努力保持自主权和做出决策的困难。本文还强调了疼痛对患者经济、家庭和社会生活的影响。

结论

在提供阿片类药物信息和设定治疗目标时,医疗保健专业人员应更多地考虑患者的体验。更多地考虑影响 CP 体验的健康决定因素,可能会为 CP 提供更有效的解决方案。