Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Vestibular Disorders.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital.
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Aug;41(7):956-963. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002670.
To determine if symptoms regarding timing and triggers of dizziness are useful for categorizing patients with dizziness, and to evaluate how patient-reported symptoms predict vestibular asymmetry, postural sway, and vestibular diagnoses.
Retrospective chart review.
Tertiary referral center.
Patients referred for suspected vestibular disease.
Patients completed a symptom questionnaire before laboratory testing with static posturography and bithermal caloric tests.
Evaluate whether responses from a symptom questionnaire predict caloric asymmetry, postural balance, and diagnoses.
One thousand four hundred fifty seven patients, 60.1% women, mean age 49.9 (±16.6) years were included. Vomiting was the strongest predictor for caloric asymmetry in adjusted analysis, odds ratio (OR): 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-2.06), followed by chronic hearing loss OR: 1.59 (1.19-2.13). Patients who reported constant dizziness had impaired postural balance, quantified as 15% increase in postural sway in adjusted analyses (7.25-24.6%). We found no association between caloric asymmetry and postural instability with eyes closed.
Most patients were able to describe the timing of their symptoms and a categorization based on timing seems feasible. There seemed to be an over-reporting of triggers and confirmatory testing of triggers is therefore advocated. Vomiting, but not nausea, was a strong indicator of vestibular disease in this primarily outpatient population. Caloric asymmetry and postural balance were not associated, and assessment of fall risk may be warranted in patients who reports constant dizziness, visual disturbances or dizziness triggered by light, darkness or sounds.
确定头晕的时间和触发因素相关症状是否有助于对头晕患者进行分类,并评估患者报告的症状如何预测前庭不对称、姿势摆动和前庭诊断。
回顾性图表审查。
三级转诊中心。
因疑似前庭疾病就诊的患者。
患者在进行静态姿势描记和双侧冷热试验的实验室检查前完成症状问卷。
评估症状问卷的回答是否可以预测冷热试验不对称、姿势平衡和诊断结果。
共纳入 1457 例患者,60.1%为女性,平均年龄 49.9(±16.6)岁。调整分析显示,呕吐是冷热试验不对称最强的预测因素,比值比(OR)为 1.60(95%置信区间 [CI]:1.24-2.06),其次是慢性听力损失,OR 为 1.59(1.19-2.13)。报告持续头晕的患者姿势平衡受损,调整分析后姿势摆动增加 15%(7.25-24.6%)。我们未发现冷热试验不对称与闭眼时的姿势不稳定之间存在关联。
大多数患者能够描述其症状的时间,基于时间的分类似乎是可行的。患者似乎过度报告了触发因素,因此提倡对触发因素进行确认性测试。在以门诊患者为主的人群中,呕吐而不是恶心是前庭疾病的强烈指标。冷热试验不对称和姿势平衡之间没有关联,对于报告持续头晕、视觉障碍或头晕由光、黑暗或声音触发的患者,可能需要评估跌倒风险。