Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Emergency Department, Xi'an Aerospace General Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.045. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Sepsis causes varying degrees of thrombocytopenia that are closely related to the likelihood of patient mortality. This study analysed the effect of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) on the platelet count in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia and provided a reference for its treatment.
MATERIAL/METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients. Patients were divided into an rhTPO group and control group according to rhTPO use during treatment. Demographical and clinical data (age, sex, history of hypertension, diabetes, platelet counts, mortality rate, etc.) of the patients were collected and analysed using statistical software; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Of 213 patients, 84 constituted the rhTPO group and 129 constituted the control group. The increase in platelet counts was significantly higher in the rhTPO group than in the control group on the third day (43.01 ± 18.23 × 10/L vs. 36.31 ± 14.17 × 10/L, p = 0.003), fifth day (71.51 ± 39.59 × 10/L vs. 42.95 ± 20.48 × 10/L, p < 0.001) and seventh day (115.36 ± 69.41 × 10/L vs. 62.54 ± 42.70 × 10/L, p < 0.001). Further statistical analysis of the data of patients with platelet counts ≤30 × 10/L and >30 × 10/L and APACHE II scores >15 and ≤15 at the time of diagnosis showed that the increase in platelet counts in the rhTPO group was greater. There was no significant between-group difference in volume of platelet transfusions (rhTPO group 15.42 ± 17.20 vs. control group 10.93 ± 17.48, p = 0.068). The cost of ICU treatment in patients with rhTPO was higher (RMB 126,936.21 ± 86,548.27 vs. 101,685.28 ± 77,291.75, p = 0.027); however, the ICU stay time was shorter (9.20 ± 5.38 vs. 10.88 ± 6.82, p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality (rhTPO group: 25.0% vs. control group: 34.1%, p = 0.158) between the two groups.
For patients with severe thrombocytopenia or severe sepsis, rhTPO was efficacious in increasing their platelet counts, resulting in a shorter ICU stay time.
脓毒症导致不同程度的血小板减少症,与患者死亡率密切相关。本研究分析了 rhTPO 对脓毒症相关血小板减少症危重症患者血小板计数的影响,为其治疗提供参考。
材料/方法:本研究为回顾性分析患者的临床资料。根据治疗过程中 rhTPO 的使用情况,将患者分为 rhTPO 组和对照组。收集并分析患者的人口统计学和临床数据(年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病史、血小板计数、死亡率等);p<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
213 例患者中,84 例纳入 rhTPO 组,129 例纳入对照组。rhTPO 组第 3 天(43.01±18.23×10/L 比 36.31±14.17×10/L,p=0.003)、第 5 天(71.51±39.59×10/L 比 42.95±20.48×10/L,p<0.001)和第 7 天(115.36±69.41×10/L 比 62.54±42.70×10/L,p<0.001)血小板计数增加均显著高于对照组。对血小板计数≤30×10/L 和>30×10/L 及诊断时 APACHE II 评分>15 和≤15 的患者进行数据分析,rhTPO 组血小板计数增加更大。两组血小板输注量(rhTPO 组 15.42±17.20 比对照组 10.93±17.48,p=0.068)无显著差异。rhTPO 组 ICU 治疗费用较高(人民币 126936.21±86548.27 比 101685.28±77291.75,p=0.027);但 ICU 住院时间较短(9.20±5.38 比 10.88±6.82,p=0.047)。两组 28 天死亡率无显著差异(rhTPO 组:25.0%比对照组:34.1%,p=0.158)。
对于严重血小板减少症或严重脓毒症患者,rhTPO 能有效增加血小板计数,缩短 ICU 住院时间。