Mohr Jay P, Overbey Jessica R, Hartmann Andreas, Kummer Rüdiger von, Al-Shahi Salman Rustam, Kim Helen, van der Worp H Bart, Parides Michael K, Stefani Marco A, Houdart Emmanuel, Libman Richard, Pile-Spellman John, Harkness Kirsty, Cordonnier Charlotte, Moquete Ellen, Biondi Alessandra, Klijn Catharina J M, Stapf Christian, Moskowitz Alan J
Doris and Stanley Tananbaum Stroke Center, The Neurological Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Jul;19(7):573-581. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30181-2.
In A Randomized trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA), randomisation was halted at a mean follow-up of 33·3 months after a prespecified interim analysis showed that medical management alone was superior to the combination of medical management and interventional therapy in preventing symptomatic stroke or death. We aimed to study whether these differences persisted through 5-years' follow-up.
ARUBA was a non-blinded, randomised trial done at 39 clinical centres in nine countries. Adults (age ≥18 years) diagnosed with an unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation, who had never undergone interventional therapy, and were considered by participating clinical centres to be suitable for intervention to eradicate the lesion, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based data collection system, stratified by clinical centre in a random permuted block design with block sizes of two, four, and six, to medical management alone or with interventional therapy (neurosurgery, embolisation, or stereotactic radiotherapy, alone or in any combination, sequence, or number). Although patients and investigators at a given centre were not masked to treatment assignment, investigators at other centres and those in the clinical coordinating centre were not informed of assignment or outcomes at any of the centres. The primary outcome was time to death or symptomatic stroke confirmed by imaging, assessed by a neurologist at each centre not involved in the management of participants' care, and monitored by an independent committee using an adaptive approach with interim analyses. Enrolment began on April 4, 2007, and was halted on April 15, 2013, after which follow-up continued until July 15, 2015. All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00389181.
Of 1740 patients screened, 226 were randomly assigned to medical management alone (n=110) or medical management plus interventional therapy (n=116). During a mean follow-up of 50·4 months (SD 22·9), the incidence of death or symptomatic stroke was lower with medical management alone (15 of 110, 3·39 per 100 patient-years) than with medical management with interventional therapy (41 of 116, 12·32 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 0·31, 95% CI 0·17 to 0·56). Two patients in the medical management group and four in the interventional therapy group (two attributed to intervention) died during follow-up. Adverse events were observed less often in patients allocated to medical management compared with interventional therapy (283 vs 369; 58·97 vs 78·73 per 100 patient-years; risk difference -19·76, 95% CI -30·33 to -9·19).
After extended follow-up, ARUBA showed that medical management alone remained superior to interventional therapy for the prevention of death or symptomatic stroke in patients with an unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation. The data concerning the disparity in outcomes should affect standard specialist practice and the information presented to patients. The even longer-term risks and differences between the two therapeutic approaches remains uncertain.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke for the randomisation phase and Vital Projects Fund for the follow-up phase.
在未破裂脑动静脉畸形随机试验(ARUBA)中,预定的中期分析显示,单纯药物治疗在预防有症状性卒中或死亡方面优于药物治疗与介入治疗联合使用,因此在平均随访33.3个月时提前终止了随机分组。我们旨在研究这些差异在5年随访期内是否仍然存在。
ARUBA是一项在9个国家39个临床中心进行的非盲法随机试验。纳入标准为:年龄≥18岁、诊断为未破裂脑动静脉畸形、从未接受过介入治疗且参与研究的临床中心认为适合通过干预根除病变的成年人。患者通过基于网络的数据收集系统按1:1随机分组,采用随机排列区组设计(区组大小为2、4和6),按临床中心分层,分为单纯药物治疗组或药物治疗联合介入治疗组(神经外科手术、栓塞或立体定向放射治疗,单独或联合使用,顺序或数量不限)。尽管特定中心的患者和研究人员未对治疗分配设盲,但其他中心的研究人员以及临床协调中心的人员均未被告知任何中心的分配情况或结果。主要结局为影像学证实的死亡或有症状性卒中的时间,由各中心不参与患者治疗管理的神经科医生评估,并由独立委员会采用适应性方法进行中期分析监测。研究于2007年4月4日开始入组,2013年4月15日停止入组,之后继续随访至2015年7月15日。所有分析均采用意向性分析。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT00389181。
在1740例筛查患者中,226例被随机分配至单纯药物治疗组(n = 110)或药物治疗联合介入治疗组(n = 116)。在平均50.4个月(标准差22.9)的随访期内,单纯药物治疗组的死亡或有症状性卒中发生率低于药物治疗联合介入治疗组(110例中有15例,每100患者年3.39例;116例中有41例,每100患者年12.32例;风险比0.31,95%置信区间0.17至0.56)。随访期间,药物治疗组有2例患者死亡,介入治疗组有4例患者死亡(2例归因于干预)。与介入治疗组相比,药物治疗组患者不良事件的发生率更低(283次 vs 369次;每100患者年58.97次 vs 78.73次;风险差异 -19.76,95%置信区间 -30.33至 -9.19)。
延长随访期后,ARUBA研究表明,对于未破裂脑动静脉畸形患者,单纯药物治疗在预防死亡或有症状性卒中方面仍优于介入治疗。有关结局差异的数据应会影响标准的专科诊疗实践以及向患者提供的信息。两种治疗方法的更长期风险及差异仍不确定。
随机分组阶段由美国国立神经疾病与卒中研究所资助,随访阶段由重要项目基金资助。