Baptista Vinicius Santos, da Silva Erik Basbasque, de Oliveira Bianchi Jaqueline Simone, Jong-A-Liem Glaucia Suzanna, de Souza Coelho Daniela, Wuo-Silva Raphael, Chaddad-Neto Feres
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Medical School, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano, São Caetano, SP, Brazil.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 15;48(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03200-1.
To evaluate the incidence of mortality, hemorrhage, and neurological deficits in treating intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in patients over 18 through a comparative analysis of surgical approaches and other therapeutic modalities. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and LILACS databases in November 2023. Inclusion criteria included clinical trials, cohorts studies, case-controls studies, and case series comparing patients over 18 undergoing surgery or microsurgery versus other treatments (radiosurgery, isolated embolization, and conservative treatment). Exclusions criteria included studies on non-AVM diseases, non-intracranial AVMs, cavernous malformations, pregnant patients, and those treated with both radiosurgery and microsurgery. Twelve studies included 1,555 patients, with an average age of 42.65 years. Of these, 711 underwent surgery (with or without prior embolization), and 844 underwent other procedures. In the surgery group, the incidence of death was 1.69%, while in the other procedures group, it was 2.96%. The incidence of neurological deficits and hemorrhage in the surgery group was 11.67% and 4.22%, respectively. In other procedures, these incidences were both 9.12%. The average obliteration rate in the surgery group was 97.45%, compared to 49.77% for radiosurgery, 38.46% for isolated embolization, and 0.6% for conservative treatment. This systematic review highlighs that surgery achieves the highest AVM obliteration rates but carries a higher risk neurological déficits. Radiosurgery minimizes these risks, while conservative treatment offers advantages in mortality and hemorrhage reduction. No single modality proves to be universally superior, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches and further randomized trials to clarify comparative safety and efficacy.
通过对手术方法和其他治疗方式的比较分析,评估18岁以上患者治疗颅内动静脉畸形(AVM)时的死亡率、出血率和神经功能缺损发生率。2023年11月,使用MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL和LILACS数据库进行了一项系统评价。纳入标准包括临床试验、队列研究、病例对照研究以及比较18岁以上接受手术或显微手术与其他治疗(放射外科、单纯栓塞和保守治疗)的患者的病例系列。排除标准包括关于非AVM疾病、非颅内AVM、海绵状畸形、孕妇以及接受放射外科和显微手术联合治疗的患者的研究。12项研究纳入了1555例患者,平均年龄为42.65岁。其中,711例接受了手术(有或无术前栓塞),844例接受了其他治疗。手术组的死亡率为1.69%,而其他治疗组为2.96%。手术组神经功能缺损和出血的发生率分别为11.67%和4.22%。在其他治疗中,这些发生率均为9.12%。手术组的平均闭塞率为97.45%,相比之下,放射外科为49.77%,单纯栓塞为38.46%,保守治疗为0.6%。这项系统评价强调,手术实现了最高的AVM闭塞率,但神经功能缺损风险更高。放射外科将这些风险降至最低,而保守治疗在降低死亡率和出血方面具有优势。没有一种治疗方式被证明普遍优越,这强调了个性化方法的必要性以及进一步的随机试验以阐明比较安全性和疗效。