Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark; Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark; Centre for Integrated Register-based Research (CIRRAU), Aarhus University, 8210, Aarhus V, Denmark; Big Data Centre for Environment and Health (BERTHA), Aarhus University, 8210, Aarhus V, Denmark.
Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark; Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Environ Res. 2020 Sep;188:109788. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109788. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
Natural environments have been associated with mental health benefits worldwide. However, how different elements and types of natural environments associate with mental health is still largely unknown. In this study, we perform a detailed analysis on a large, nation-wide data set of mental health records (908 553 individuals) for Denmark combined with remotely-sensed land cover and vegetation density data. We explore associations between growing up surrounded by different environments and rates of a spectrum of 18 psychiatric disorders. Childhood land cover exposure for urban, agricultural, near-natural green space, and blue space was determined around the residence of each individual. Vegetation density and air pollution were evaluated as potential pathways. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate rates as hazard ratios and then adjusted for potential confounding from other known risk factors. For 12 of 18 disorders, rates were lower for children growing up in environments with more natural elements (near-natural green space, blue space, and agriculture) compared to children growing up in urban environments. High vegetation density was associated with lower rates for most disorders within all the examined environments, whereas mitigation of air pollution by natural environments seemed a less important potential pathway. Rates were not notably changed by adjustment for urbanization, parental and municipal socioeconomic status, family history of mental illness, and parents' age. In conclusion, we found that growing up surrounded by a range of natural environments such as near-natural green space, blue space, and agriculture may lower rates of psychiatric disorders. Our results show the importance of ensuring access to natural environments from as nature-based solutions for improved public health and sustainable, livable cities.
自然环境与全球范围内的心理健康益处相关。然而,不同的自然环境要素和类型如何与心理健康相关,在很大程度上仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们对丹麦的一个大型全国性心理健康记录数据集(908553 人)进行了详细分析,该数据集与遥感土地覆盖和植被密度数据相结合。我们探讨了在不同环境中成长与一系列 18 种精神障碍发病率之间的关联。通过确定个体居住环境周围的城市、农业、近自然绿地和蓝色空间的土地覆盖暴露情况,来评估童年时期的土地覆盖暴露情况。评估了植被密度和空气污染作为潜在途径。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来估计发病率作为风险比,然后调整其他已知风险因素的潜在混杂因素。在 18 种疾病中的 12 种中,与在城市环境中成长的儿童相比,在具有更多自然元素(近自然绿地、蓝色空间和农业)的环境中成长的儿童的发病率较低。在所有检查的环境中,高植被密度与大多数疾病的发病率降低有关,而自然环境对空气污染的缓解似乎是一个不太重要的潜在途径。通过调整城市化、父母和市政社会经济地位、精神疾病家族史以及父母年龄等因素,发病率没有明显变化。总之,我们发现,在自然环境的包围下成长,如近自然绿地、蓝色空间和农业,可能会降低精神障碍的发病率。我们的研究结果表明,确保人们能够接触自然环境对于改善公共健康和建设可持续、宜居城市非常重要。