• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

框架效应在赌博障碍中的财务和健康问题方面的影响。

Framing effects on financial and health problems in gambling disorder.

作者信息

Takeuchi Hideaki, Tsurumi Kosuke, Murao Takuro, Mizuta Hiroto, Kawada Ryosaku, Murai Toshiya, Takahashi Hidehiko

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;110:106502. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106502. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106502
PMID:32563020
Abstract

Gambling disorder (GD) patients show excessively risky decision-making in the financial domain. We aimed to clarify whether GD patients show risky decision-making in domain-general or in domain-specific. Furthermore, we also investigated the effect of the well-known cognitive bias, the framing effect on GD's decision-making under risk. Sixty-two male GD patients and 74 age-matched healthy male controls (HC) conducted a risky choice task in which they should choose solutions for difficult situations between a sure and a risky option that had the same expectations. Six situations were prepared for each financial and health domain. For each domain, three situations were presented with options using positive frames, and the other three situations were presented with options using negative frames. The results showed that GD chose more risky options in the financial domain with positive frames than HC, but chose comparably in the financial domain with negative frames, whereas GD and HC chose comparably in the health domain regardless of the frames. Thus, GD showed risky decision-making in domain-specific. In addition, the results indicate the importance of considering the influence of the framing effect for assessment of risky decision-making by GD. Domains and the influence of the framing effect should be considered when decision-making patterns of neuropsychiatric disorders are studied.

摘要

赌博障碍(GD)患者在金融领域表现出过度冒险的决策行为。我们旨在阐明GD患者是在一般领域还是特定领域表现出冒险决策。此外,我们还研究了著名的认知偏差——框架效应——对GD在风险情境下决策的影响。62名男性GD患者和74名年龄匹配的健康男性对照者(HC)进行了一项风险选择任务,在该任务中,他们需要在具有相同预期的确定性选项和风险选项之间为困难情况选择解决方案。为金融和健康领域分别准备了六种情况。对于每个领域,三种情况使用积极框架呈现选项,另外三种情况使用消极框架呈现选项。结果表明,在积极框架下的金融领域,GD比HC选择了更多的风险选项,但在消极框架下的金融领域,两者选择相当,而在健康领域,无论框架如何,GD和HC的选择相当。因此,GD在特定领域表现出冒险决策。此外,结果表明在评估GD的风险决策时考虑框架效应的影响很重要。在研究神经精神疾病的决策模式时,应考虑领域以及框架效应的影响。

相似文献

1
Framing effects on financial and health problems in gambling disorder.框架效应在赌博障碍中的财务和健康问题方面的影响。
Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;110:106502. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106502. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
2
Amygdala volume is associated with risky probability cognition in gambling disorder.杏仁核体积与赌博障碍中的风险概率认知有关。
Addict Biol. 2019 Jul;24(4):802-810. doi: 10.1111/adb.12640. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
3
Confidence and risky decision-making in gambling disorder.赌博障碍中的自信与冒险决策。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Aug 21;12(3):840-846. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00041. Print 2023 Oct 5.
4
Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.多巴胺D3受体调节赢牌配对线索在大鼠赌博任务中增加风险选择的能力。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):785-94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-15.2016.
5
Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.框架效应与风险敏感决策。
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):83-97. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02047.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
Cue-induced effects on decision-making distinguish subjects with gambling disorder from healthy controls.线索诱发效应对决策的影响将赌博障碍患者与健康对照区分开来。
Addict Biol. 2020 Nov;25(6):e12841. doi: 10.1111/adb.12841. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
The role of attention in decision-making under risk in gambling disorder: An eye-tracking study.注意力在赌博障碍风险决策中的作用:一项眼动追踪研究。
Addict Behav. 2023 Mar;138:107550. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107550. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
8
Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?模糊规避在决策过程中会影响框架效应吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):572-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0688-0.
9
Deficit of state-dependent risk attitude modulation in gambling disorder.赌博障碍中状态依赖风险态度调节的缺陷。
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 4;7(4):e1085. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.55.
10
Framing effects in medical situations: distinctions of attribute, goal and risky choice frames.医疗情境中的框架效应:属性、目标和风险选择框架的区别
J Int Med Res. 2013 Jun;41(3):771-6. doi: 10.1177/0300060513476593. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Association between Gambling-Related Offenses, Substance Use, Psychiatric Comorbidities, and Treatment Outcome.探究与赌博相关的犯罪、物质使用、精神共病及治疗结果之间的关联。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 10;11(16):4669. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164669.