Suppr超能文献

临床流行病学研究中标准化的价值与风险。

The value and hazards of standardization in clinical epidemiologic research.

作者信息

Chan C K, Feinstein A R, Jekel J F, Wells C K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(11):1125-34. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90082-0.

Abstract

The statistical standardization of rates produces a single summary value that converts crude rates of occurrence into "standardized" rates that are adjusted for differences in the composition of compared populations. Although the process is well described in the epidemiologic literature and is regularly applied in comparisons of large populations, many investigators are not familiar with three important hazards that are magnified for the smaller groups studied in clinical epidemiologic research. This report contains a new "symmetrical" outline of the direct and indirect standardization processes, and an illustration of three pragmatic hazards: (1) Because the direct standardizing factor uses the observed stratum-specific rates, and because any stratum-specific rates that depend on small denominators may be misleading or unstable, the indirect method is preferred when the observed strata have small denominators. (2) Both the direct and indirect standardizing methods are highly vulnerable both to the choice of reference population and to the boundaries chosen when strata are demarcated or consolidated. The standardized rates can be altered dramatically according to differences in the stratum proportions of the reference population, or to distinctions produced when standardizing strata are consolidated. (3) If the stratum-specific rates and stratum proportions have different patterns of variation across the strata of the compared groups, the use of a single summary value--no matter what method of standardization is applied--may obscure cogent patterns of variation and significant differences in the stratum-specific rates. These hazards can be overcome if the studied group and the reference population are carefully compared for inconsistent variations in the stratum-specific rates and proportions before any standardizing procedure is applied. In many instances, the best approach may be to compare the unaltered stratum-specific rates, without standardization.

摘要

率的统计标准化产生一个单一的汇总值,该值将粗发生率转换为“标准化”率,这些标准化率针对被比较人群组成的差异进行了调整。尽管该过程在流行病学文献中有详细描述,并且在大人群比较中经常应用,但许多研究者并不熟悉在临床流行病学研究中针对较小研究组会被放大的三个重要风险。本报告包含直接和间接标准化过程的一个新的“对称”概述,以及三个实际风险的示例:(1)由于直接标准化因子使用观察到的特定分层率,并且由于任何依赖小分母的特定分层率可能会产生误导或不稳定,因此当观察到的分层具有小分母时,间接方法更可取。(2)直接和间接标准化方法都极易受到参考人群选择以及分层划分或合并时所选边界的影响。标准化率可能会根据参考人群分层比例的差异,或者标准化分层合并时产生的差异而发生显著变化。(3)如果特定分层率和分层比例在被比较组的各分层中具有不同的变化模式,那么使用单一汇总值——无论应用何种标准化方法——可能会掩盖特定分层率中令人信服的变化模式和显著差异。如果在应用任何标准化程序之前,仔细比较研究组和参考人群在特定分层率和比例方面的不一致变化,这些风险是可以克服的。在许多情况下,最佳方法可能是比较未改变的特定分层率,而不进行标准化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验