Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Stop A8000, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104330. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104330. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
While major depressive disorder has been associated with increased veridical memory for negative information, prior false memory literature has linked high depressive symptoms to increased false memory for negative information. We tested whether these contradictory findings may be due to semantic and emotional cohesion inflating false alarm rates in the most commonly used false memory paradigm - the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM). In Experiment 1, healthy controls and depressive participants completed two emotional false memory tasks: the DRM, using semantically associated words, and an adaptation using orthographically associated words. Participants encoded words associated with neutral or negative critical lures. During subsequent recognition memory testing, errors were greater for negative than neutral semantic critical lures, but the opposite pattern was observed for orthographic critical lures. These findings support that orthographically associated stimuli provide a non-confounded method to test emotional false memory. In Experiment 2, we deployed the orthographic paradigm with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and a state measure of negative mood (Positive and Negative Affective Scale) to better understand neurocognitive components of emotional false memory. Replicating Experiment 1, we found fewer false alarms for negative than neutral novel orthographically associated words. The EEG data showed significant differences in two memory-related event-related potentials: the familiarity-related N400, and the recollection-related late positive component (LPC). N400 amplitudes were larger for true versus false endorsements. For LPC, increasing depressive symptoms predicted greater amplitude differences for true versus false negative items and reduced differences for neutral items. However, increasingly negative mood predicted reduced amplitude differences for negative items, and greater amplitude differences for neutral items. Although depressive symptoms and negative mood state are highly correlated, they may inform differentially influence shifts in memory retrieval strategies, with depressive symptoms predicting reduced false alarms for negative information, and negative mood state predicting increased recollection errors for negative information.
虽然重度抑郁症与对负面信息的真实记忆增加有关,但先前的虚假记忆文献表明,高抑郁症状与对负面信息的虚假记忆增加有关。我们测试了这些矛盾的发现是否可能是由于语义和情感凝聚力在最常用的虚假记忆范式——Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)中夸大了错误警报率。在实验 1 中,健康对照组和抑郁组参与者完成了两个情绪性虚假记忆任务:DRM,使用语义相关的单词,以及使用正字法相关单词的改编版。参与者对与中性或负面关键诱饵相关的单词进行编码。在随后的识别记忆测试中,对于负面语义关键诱饵的错误比中性语义关键诱饵更多,但对于正字法关键诱饵则观察到相反的模式。这些发现支持正字法相关刺激提供了一种非混淆的方法来测试情绪性虚假记忆。在实验 2 中,我们使用正字法范式结合同时进行的脑电图(EEG)和负性情绪的状态测量(正性和负性情绪量表),以更好地理解情绪性虚假记忆的神经认知成分。实验 1 中,我们发现对于负面而非中性的新颖正字法相关单词,错误警报更少。EEG 数据显示两个与记忆相关的事件相关电位(ERP)存在显著差异:熟悉度相关的 N400 和回忆相关的晚期正成分(LPC)。对于真实和虚假的认可,N400 振幅更大。对于 LPC,抑郁症状的增加预测了真实与虚假的负性项目之间的振幅差异更大,而中性项目之间的振幅差异更小。然而,负性情绪状态的增加预测了负性项目的振幅差异减小,而中性项目的振幅差异增大。尽管抑郁症状和负性情绪状态高度相关,但它们可能以不同的方式影响记忆检索策略的转变,抑郁症状预测对负性信息的错误警报减少,而负性情绪状态预测对负性信息的回忆错误增加。