Pediatric Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt Cleft and Craniofacial Team, United States.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;136:110182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110182. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
Over the last 10-15 years, usage of internal mandibular distraction systems has increased in the pediatric population, particularly for craniofacial syndromes. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has been shown to be effective in avoiding tracheostomy or achieving early decannulation in patients with micro-retrognathic mandibles in hemifacial microsomia or Pierre Robin sequence. As the frequency of the application of MDO has increased, so has the awareness and management of subsequent complications from the procedure. In this study, we discuss a complication involving paresis and eventual recovery of cranial nerve (CN) VII after the application of an MDO internal device at our institution in two cases. We also review the literature and propose multiple anatomic considerations that can impact more than just the marginal branch of CN VII.
This study is a retrospective case study from our institution and a review of the literature. Pubmed was queried for terms singularly and in combination including "mandibular distraction osteogenesis", "facial nerve", "cranial nerve", "complications", "micrognathia", "retrognathia". After reviewing the results, studies discussing complications of MDO that involved CN VII were reviewed and included.
In the literature review and our retrospective review, CN VII injuries from MDO vary in their length and timing of onset. Management of this complication depended on the timing of onset and ranged from conservative management to removal of the distraction device. Majority (7/9) of the cases resolved to an eventual House-Brackmann of 0/6 with conservative measures.
Total facial nerve injury in association with MDO, has been scarcely reported, though the facial nerve is at great risk given its intimate location near the mandible particularly in neonates. It is encouraging that though it could be a devastating complication, out of all the cases reported, the large majority resolve with a combination of time and steroids.
在过去的 10-15 年中,下颌骨内牵引系统在儿科人群中的使用有所增加,尤其是在颅面综合征中。下颌骨牵引成骨术(MDO)已被证明在避免气管切开术或在半面短小畸形或 Pierre Robin 序列中下颌后缩的患者中实现早期拔管方面是有效的。随着 MDO 的应用频率增加,人们对该手术的后续并发症的认识和处理也有所增加。在本研究中,我们讨论了我们机构在两例病例中应用 MDO 内置装置后出现的 VII 颅神经麻痹和最终恢复的并发症。我们还回顾了文献,并提出了多个可能影响 VII 颅神经的分支以外的解剖学因素。
这是我们机构的回顾性病例研究和文献复习。在 Pubmed 上分别和联合检索了“下颌骨牵引成骨术”、“面神经”、“颅神经”、“并发症”、“小下颌”、“下颌后缩”等术语。在审查结果后,我们回顾了讨论 MDO 并发症涉及 VII 颅神经的研究,并将其纳入。
在文献复习和我们的回顾性复习中,MDO 引起的 VII 颅神经损伤在长度和发病时间上有所不同。这种并发症的处理取决于发病时间,并从保守治疗到移除牵引装置不等。大多数(7/9)病例通过保守治疗最终恢复至 House-Brackmann 0/6 级。
尽管面神经位于下颌骨附近,位置非常接近,风险很大,但与 MDO 相关的总面神经损伤很少有报道。尽管这可能是一种毁灭性的并发症,但在所有报告的病例中,绝大多数病例通过时间和类固醇的联合治疗得到缓解,这令人鼓舞。