Nephrology Department, Hospital Vithas Perpetuo Internacional, Alicante, Spain; Nephrolgy Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, RedinRen, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2020 Nov-Dec;40(6):640-646. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
The lack of adherence to phosphate -binders (PB) is the most important factor in not achieving the objectives of serum phosphorus (sP). Studies in the real-world population are needed to understand the influence of PBs on adherence and how to modify it.
Prospective study conducted during 3 months in usual clinical practice. Out of 105 hemodialysis patients, 57 were switched to SFOH and 48 maintained their baseline treatment (control group). sP levels and the percentage of patients with sP levels <5mg/dl were compared. Adherence before and after introduction of SFOH, number of pills of PB, preferences in the administration mode and side effects were analyzed.
The percentage of patients with controlled sP (<5mg/dl) increased significantly in the SFOH users' group (62.1-92.9%, p<0.001), but not in the control group (83-83.3%, p=NS). The average of daily tablets decreased significantly in the SFOH group (7.2-2.3 comp, p<0.001), but not in the control group (5.6-5.6, p=NS) and 100% of the patients used only one PB in SFOH group. The use of SFOH increased the adherence according to the SMAQ questionnaire (57.8-84.3%; OR 13.1, p<0.001). The possibility to choose the preferred mode of administration (split-swallowing 89% compared to chewing 11%), improved the acceptance (44.7-78%). 14% of the patients experienced side effects and in 5.2% SFOH was discontinued for this reason.
SFOH controlled serum sP in 93% of patients, 100% in monotherapy, and with fewer tablets. The exploration and adaptation of preferences in the mode of administration influenced the acceptance of the drug by the patient and, probably, the future adherence.
不遵守磷酸盐结合剂(PB)是未能达到血清磷(sP)目标的最重要因素。需要在真实人群中进行研究,以了解 PB 对依从性的影响以及如何进行调整。
在常规临床实践中进行了为期 3 个月的前瞻性研究。在 105 名血液透析患者中,57 名患者转为使用 SFOH,48 名患者维持基线治疗(对照组)。比较 sP 水平和 sP 水平<5mg/dl 的患者比例。分析引入 SFOH 前后的依从性、PB 片数、给药方式偏好和副作用。
SFOH 使用者组 sP 控制(<5mg/dl)的患者比例显著增加(62.1-92.9%,p<0.001),但对照组无变化(83-83.3%,p=NS)。SFOH 组的每日片剂平均用量显著减少(7.2-2.3 片,p<0.001),但对照组无变化(5.6-5.6 片,p=NS),且 100%的患者在 SFOH 组中仅使用一种 PB。根据 SMAQ 问卷,SFOH 的使用增加了依从性(57.8-84.3%;OR 13.1,p<0.001)。选择首选给药方式的可能性(89%的患者选择分片吞咽,11%的患者选择咀嚼)提高了接受度(44.7-78%)。14%的患者出现副作用,5.2%的患者因该原因停止使用 SFOH。
SFOH 控制了 93%的患者的血清 sP,100%的患者单药治疗,且用药片数更少。给药方式偏好的探索和调整影响了患者对药物的接受度,可能影响未来的依从性。