Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停后 P25/30 皮质体感诱发电位振幅的预后价值。

Prognostic Value of P25/30 Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu-si, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):1304-1311. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004460.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic performance of the peak amplitude of P25/30 cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in predicting nonawakening in targeted temperature management-treated cardiac arrest patients.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis.

SETTING

Four academic tertiary care hospitals.

PATIENTS

Eighty-seven cardiac arrest survivors after targeted temperature management.

INTERVENTIONS

Analysis of the amplitude of P25/30.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In all participants, somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded after rewarming, and bilaterally absent pupillary and corneal reflexes were evaluated at 72 hours after the return of spontaneous circulation. We analyzed the amplitudes of the N20 and P25/30 peaks and the N20-P25/30 complex in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Upon hospital discharge, 87 patients were dichotomized into the awakening and nonawakening groups. The lowest amplitudes of N20, P25/30, and N20-P25/30 in the awakening patients were 0.17, 0.45, and 0.73 μV, respectively, and these thresholds showed a sensitivity of 70.5% (95% CI, 54.8-83.2%), 86.4% (95% CI, 72.7-94.8%), and 75.0% (95% CI, 59.7-86.8%), respectively, for nonawakening. The area under the curve of the P25/30 amplitude was significantly higher than that of the N20 amplitude (0.955 [95% CI, 0.912-0.998] vs 0.894 [95% CI, 0.819-0.969]; p = 0.036) and was comparable with that of the N20-P25/30 amplitude (0.931 [95% CI, 0.873-0.989]). Additionally, adding resuscitation variables or an absent brainstem reflex to the P25/30 amplitude showed a trend toward improving prognostic performance compared with the use of other somatosensory evoked potential amplitudes (area under the curve, 0.958; 95% CI, 0.917-0.999 and area under the curve, 0.974; 95% CI, 0.914-0.996, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence that the absence of the P25/30 peak and a reduction in the P25/30 amplitude may be considered prognostic indicators in these patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 P25/30 皮质体感诱发电位峰值幅度在预测目标温度管理治疗心脏骤停患者无法苏醒中的预后表现。

设计

前瞻性分析。

设置

四家学术性三级护理医院。

患者

目标温度管理治疗后的 87 名心脏骤停幸存者。

干预

分析 P25/30 的幅度。

测量和主要结果

在所有参与者中,在复温后记录体感诱发电位,并在自主循环恢复后 72 小时评估双侧瞳孔和角膜反射消失情况。我们分析了皮质体感诱发电位中 N20 和 P25/30 峰值以及 N20-P25/30 复合波的幅度。出院时,87 名患者被分为苏醒组和未苏醒组。苏醒患者的 N20、P25/30 和 N20-P25/30 的最低幅度分别为 0.17、0.45 和 0.73 μV,这些阈值的灵敏度分别为 70.5%(95%CI,54.8-83.2%)、86.4%(95%CI,72.7-94.8%)和 75.0%(95%CI,59.7-86.8%)。P25/30 幅度的曲线下面积明显高于 N20 幅度(0.955[95%CI,0.912-0.998]与 0.894[95%CI,0.819-0.969];p=0.036),与 N20-P25/30 幅度相当(0.931[95%CI,0.873-0.989])。此外,与使用其他体感诱发电位幅度相比,将复苏变量或脑干反射缺失添加到 P25/30 幅度中,其预后表现呈现出改善的趋势(曲线下面积,0.958;95%CI,0.917-0.999 和曲线下面积,0.974;95%CI,0.914-0.996)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,P25/30 波峰缺失和 P25/30 幅度降低可作为此类患者的预后指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验