Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Public Health, Section of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 20;740:139759. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139759. Epub 2020 May 27.
Mining rare earth elements (REEs) can release large amounts of metal(loid)-rich dust, which can pose significant health risks to local residents. However, compared to other types of particulates, toxicity of mining dust has been largely overlooked. To provide experimental evidence on toxicity of REE mine dust, the study assessed the oxidative stress potential and genotoxicity of inhalable particles collected in a REE mining area, and associated toxicological response with source compositions. Both source types (i.e., mine and tailing area) and distances from source (i.e., industrial and residential areas) were considered when selecting the 44 sampling sites. The particle samples contained 2.3-3.5 folds higher concentrations of tested metal(loid)s than background concentrations in soil. Specially, elevated Fe, REEs, Cd, Pb were found. In spite of low cytotoxicity in lung epithelial A549 cells, there was increased cellular ROS production by of particle exposure. Samples with higher mining-originated source contributions (Provenance Index <0.3) had higher cellular ROS production (1.72 fold, 95%CI: 1.66-1.79 fold) than samples with lower mining contributions (1.58 fold, 95%CI: 1.52-1.65 fold). The factors soil (46%), mine (22%), and heavy metal (~20%) sources were recognized by source apportionment analysis as the main contributors to cellular ROS production; importantly, mine and heavy metal sources counted more in industrial samples. While samples generated genotoxicity, there were no differences in DNA damage between the location groups of sampling. Collectively, the results indicate that particles in mining areas may cause ROS production and DNA damage in lung cells depending on mine dust. Coupled with the long-range transportation potential of mine dust, safety measures on open pit and dust disposal sites should be adopted.
开采稀土元素 (REEs) 会释放大量富含金属 (类) 的粉尘,这会对当地居民的健康造成重大风险。然而,与其他类型的颗粒物相比,开采粉尘的毒性在很大程度上被忽视了。为了提供关于稀土矿粉尘毒性的实验证据,本研究评估了在稀土矿区采集的可吸入颗粒物的氧化应激潜力和遗传毒性,并将毒性反应与源成分相关联。在选择 44 个采样点时,同时考虑了源类型(即矿区和尾矿区)和与源的距离(即工业和居民区)。颗粒样品中测试的金属 (类) 浓度比土壤中的背景浓度高出 2.3-3.5 倍。特别是,发现 Fe、REEs、Cd 和 Pb 等元素的浓度升高。尽管肺部上皮 A549 细胞的细胞毒性较低,但颗粒物暴露会增加细胞内 ROS 的产生。具有更高采矿起源源贡献(起源指数 <0.3)的样品具有更高的细胞内 ROS 产生(1.72 倍,95%CI:1.66-1.79 倍)比具有较低采矿贡献(1.58 倍,95%CI:1.52-1.65 倍)的样品。源分配分析确定土壤(约 46%)、矿山(约 22%)和重金属(约 20%)源是导致细胞内 ROS 产生的主要因素;重要的是,矿山和重金属源在工业样品中占比更多。虽然样品产生了遗传毒性,但采样地点组之间的 DNA 损伤没有差异。总的来说,结果表明,矿区的颗粒物可能会导致肺部细胞产生 ROS 和 DNA 损伤,这取决于矿山粉尘。再加上矿山粉尘的长距离传输潜力,应在露天矿和粉尘处理场采取安全措施。