Wilson Sarah E, Wilton Andrew S, Young Jacqueline, Candido Elisa, Bunko Andrean, Buchan Sarah A, Crowcroft Natasha S, Deeks Shelley L, Guttmann Astrid, Halperin Scott A, Kwong Jeffrey C, Wilson Kumanan, Tu Karen
Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vaccine. 2020 Jul 14;38(33):5223-5230. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
In Ontario, Canada, parents have the responsibility to report their child's routine infant and childhood vaccines to the provincial immunization registry (the Digital Health Immunization Repository; DHIR) without healthcare provider validation. Despite its use in routine immunization coverage monitoring, no study has previously examined the completeness of immunization data within the DHIR.
We assessed the completeness of DHIR immunizations, as compared to immunizations within the Electronic Medical Records-Primary Care (EMRPC) database, also known as EMRALD, a network of family physician electronic medical records (EMRs). We linked client records from the DHIR and EMRPC to a centralized population file. To create the study cohort, we examined children born during 2005-2008 and further defined the cohort based on those rostered to an EMRPC physician, visit criteria to ensure ongoing care by an EMRPC provider, and school attendance in Ontario at age 7. We calculated up-to-date (UTD) immunization coverage at age 7 for individual vaccines and overall using data from the DHIR and EMRPC separately, and compared the estimates.
The analytic cohort to assess DHIR data completeness included 2,657 children. Overall UTD coverage (all vaccines assessed) was 82.0% in the DHIR and 67.6% in EMRPC. UTD coverage was higher in the DHIR for all vaccines assessed individually, with the exception of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (difference = 0.3%). After excluding two EMRPC sites with irregularities in immunization data, the difference in overall UTD coverage between systems decreased from 14.4% to 6.6% INTERPRETATION: These results validate the use of DHIR for coverage assessment but also suggest that bidirectional exchange of immunization information has the potential to increase immunization data completeness in both systems.
在加拿大安大略省,父母有责任向省级免疫登记处(数字健康免疫库;DHIR)报告其子女的常规婴儿和儿童疫苗接种情况,无需医疗服务提供者确认。尽管它用于常规免疫接种覆盖率监测,但此前尚无研究考察过DHIR内免疫数据的完整性。
我们评估了DHIR免疫接种情况的完整性,并与电子病历-初级保健(EMRPC)数据库(也称为EMRALD,一个家庭医生电子病历网络)中的免疫接种情况进行比较。我们将DHIR和EMRPC中的客户记录与一个集中的人口文件相链接。为创建研究队列,我们考察了2005年至2008年出生的儿童,并根据登记在EMRPC医生名下的儿童、就诊标准(以确保由EMRPC提供者持续提供护理)以及7岁时在安大略省上学情况进一步界定队列。我们分别使用DHIR和EMRPC的数据计算了7岁时个体疫苗和总体的最新(UTD)免疫接种覆盖率,并比较了估计值。
评估DHIR数据完整性的分析队列包括2657名儿童。DHIR中的总体UTD覆盖率(评估的所有疫苗)为82.0%,EMRPC中的为67.6%。除脑膜炎球菌C结合疫苗外(差异=0.3%),DHIR中评估的所有个体疫苗的UTD覆盖率都更高。在排除两个免疫数据存在异常的EMRPC站点后,两个系统之间总体UTD覆盖率的差异从14.4%降至6.6%。解释:这些结果验证了使用DHIR进行覆盖率评估的有效性,但也表明免疫信息的双向交换有可能提高两个系统中免疫数据的完整性。