Wilson Sarah E, Quach Susan, MacDonald Shannon E, Naus Monika, Deeks Shelley L, Crowcroft Natasha S, Mahmud Salaheddin M, Tran Dat, Kwong Jeff, Tu Karen, Gilbert Nicolas L, Johnson Caitlin, Desai Shalini
a Public Health Ontario , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
b Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Aug 3;13(8):1928-1936. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1319022. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Accurate and complete immunization data are necessary to assess vaccine coverage, safety and effectiveness. Across Canada, different methods and data sources are used to assess vaccine coverage, but these have not been systematically described. Our primary objective was to examine and describe the methods used to determine immunization coverage in Canada. The secondary objective was to compare routine infant and childhood coverage estimates derived from the Canadian 2013 Childhood National Immunization Coverage Survey (cNICS) with estimates collected from provinces and territories (P/Ts). We collected information from key informants regarding their provincial, territorial or federal methods for assessing immunization coverage. We also collected P/T coverage estimates for select antigens and birth cohorts to determine absolute differences between these and estimates from cNICS. Twenty-six individuals across 16 public health organizations participated between April and August 2015. Coverage surveys are conducted regularly for toddlers in Quebec and in one health authority in British Columbia. Across P/Ts, different methodologies for measuring coverage are used (e.g., valid doses, grace periods). Most P/Ts, except Ontario, measure up-to-date (UTD) coverage and 4 P/Ts also assess on-time coverage. The degree of concordance between P/T and cNICS coverage estimates varied by jurisdiction, antigen and age group. In addition to differences in the data sources and processes used for coverage assessment, there are also differences between Canadian P/Ts in the methods used for calculating immunization coverage. Comparisons between P/T and cNICS estimates leave remaining questions about the proportion of children fully vaccinated in Canada.
准确而完整的免疫接种数据对于评估疫苗接种率、安全性和有效性至关重要。在加拿大全国范围内,人们使用不同的方法和数据来源来评估疫苗接种率,但这些方法尚未得到系统描述。我们的主要目标是研究和描述加拿大用于确定免疫接种率的方法。次要目标是将加拿大2013年儿童全国免疫接种率调查(cNICS)得出的常规婴儿和儿童接种率估计值与从各省和地区(P/Ts)收集的估计值进行比较。我们从关键信息提供者那里收集了有关其省级、地区级或联邦级评估免疫接种率方法的信息。我们还收集了特定抗原和出生队列的P/T接种率估计值,以确定这些估计值与cNICS估计值之间的绝对差异。2015年4月至8月期间,来自16个公共卫生组织的26个人参与了调查。魁北克省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的一个卫生当局定期对幼儿进行接种率调查。在各个P/Ts中,使用了不同的方法来衡量接种率(例如,有效剂量、宽限期)。除安大略省外,大多数P/Ts衡量最新(UTD)接种率,4个P/Ts还评估按时接种率。P/T与cNICS接种率估计值之间的一致程度因司法管辖区、抗原和年龄组而异。除了用于接种率评估的数据来源和流程存在差异外,加拿大各P/Ts在计算免疫接种率的方法上也存在差异。P/T与cNICS估计值之间的比较留下了关于加拿大完全接种疫苗儿童比例的一些问题。