Department of Dermatology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesahwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04401, South Korea.
Department of Dermatology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, Bucheon, South Korea.
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Feb;36(1):165-173. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03069-0. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
Fractional carbon dioxide (CO) laser has been used with conventional treatments for vitiligo, demonstrating more effectiveness compared with conventional treatments alone. Especially, fractional CO laser combined with narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) was shown to induce more improvement compared with NB-UVB monotherapy for treating stable non-segmental vitiligo. However, the effectiveness of fractional CO laser plus NB-UVB for the treatment of non-segmental vitiligo remains controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to confirm the safety and efficacy of fractional CO laser combined with NB-UVB compared with NB-UVB monotherapy in stable non-segmental vitiligo. We searched the data from different databases, including Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed up to January 2020. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for comparison between fractional CO laser plus NB-UVB and NB-UVB monotherapy in patients with stable non-segmental vitiligo were included. We performed meta-analyses for repigmentation improvement and patient satisfaction as well as subgroup analyses based on acral or non-acral vitiligo, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The combination treatment showed more superior results than NB-UVB monotherapy (≥ 75% repigmentation, RR 4.60, 95% CI 1.19-17.74; ≥ 50% repigmentation, RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.45-11.17; < 25% repigmentation, RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.08). Also, fractional CO laser plus NB-UVB significantly improved acral and non-acral vitiligo compared with NB-UVB monotherapy (standard mean difference (SMD) 1.24, 95% CI 0.66-1.82; SMD 1.14, 95% CI 0.67-1.60, respectively), while it increased markedly patient satisfaction compared with NB-UVB monotherapy (SMD 1.12, 95% CI 0.66-1.58). Collectively, this meta-analysis suggested that fractional CO laser combined with NB-UVB might be more effective for treating non-segmental vitiligo than NB-UVB monotherapy.
分比二氧化碳(CO)激光已与常规疗法联合用于治疗白癜风,与单独常规疗法相比,显示出更有效的效果。特别是,分比 CO 激光联合窄谱中波紫外线(NB-UVB)治疗稳定型非节段性白癜风,与 NB-UVB 单一疗法相比,诱导改善的效果更为明显。然而,分比 CO 激光联合 NB-UVB 治疗非节段性白癜风的疗效仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在证实分比 CO 激光联合 NB-UVB 治疗稳定型非节段性白癜风的安全性和疗效优于 NB-UVB 单一疗法。我们检索了截至 2020 年 1 月来自 Cochrane、Embase 和 PubMed 等不同数据库的数据。纳入了 4 项比较分比 CO 激光联合 NB-UVB 与 NB-UVB 单一疗法治疗稳定型非节段性白癜风的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们根据 PRISMA 指南,对色素恢复改善和患者满意度进行了荟萃分析,并根据肢端或非肢端白癜风进行了亚组分析。联合治疗比 NB-UVB 单一疗法有更优越的结果(≥75%色素恢复,RR 4.60,95%CI 1.19-17.74;≥50%色素恢复,RR 2.24,95%CI 0.45-11.17;<25%色素恢复,RR 0.81,95%CI 0.60-1.08)。此外,分比 CO 激光联合 NB-UVB 治疗肢端和非肢端白癜风明显优于 NB-UVB 单一疗法(标准均数差(SMD)1.24,95%CI 0.66-1.82;SMD 1.14,95%CI 0.67-1.60),同时明显提高了患者满意度,与 NB-UVB 单一疗法相比(SMD 1.12,95%CI 0.66-1.58)。综上所述,本荟萃分析表明,分比 CO 激光联合 NB-UVB 治疗非节段性白癜风可能比 NB-UVB 单一疗法更有效。