Suppr超能文献

制定马来西亚精神科系统协作实践的共识性建议:一项改良德尔菲研究。

Creation of consensus recommendations for collaborative practice in the Malaysian psychiatric system: a modified Delphi study.

作者信息

Shoesmith Wendy, Chua Sze Hung, Giridharan Beena, Forman Dawn, Fyfe Sue

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.

Curtin University, Miri, Sarawak Malaysia.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Jun 19;14:45. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00374-7. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is strong evidence that collaborative practice in mental healthcare improves outcomes for patients. The concept of collaborative practice can include collaboration between healthcare workers of different professional backgrounds and collaboration with patients, families and communities. Most models of collaborative practice were developed in Western and high-income countries and are not easily translatable to settings which are culturally diverse and lower in resources. This project aimed to develop a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice in Malaysia.

METHODS

In the first phase, qualitative research was conducted to better understand collaboration in a psychiatric hospital (previously published). In the second phase a local hospital level committee from the same hospital was created to act on the qualitative research and create a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice at the hospital for the hospital. Some of these recommendations were implemented, where feasible and the outcomes discussed. These recommendations were then sent to a nationwide Delphi panel. These committees consisted of healthcare staff of various professions, patients and carers.

RESULTS

The Delphi panel reached consensus after three rounds. The recommendations include ways to improve collaborative problem solving and decision making in the hospital, ways to improve the autonomy and relatedness of patients, carers and staff and ways to improve the levels of resources (e.g. skills training in staff, allowing people with lived experience of mental disorder to contribute).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the Delphi method is a feasible method of developing recommendations and guidelines in Malaysia and allowed a wider range of stakeholders to contribute than traditional methods of developing guidelines and recommendations. Registered in the National Medical Research Register, Malaysia, NMRR-13-308-14792.

摘要

背景

有充分证据表明,精神卫生保健中的协作实践可改善患者的治疗效果。协作实践的概念可包括不同专业背景的医护人员之间的协作以及与患者、家庭和社区的协作。大多数协作实践模式是在西方和高收入国家开发的,不易应用于文化多元且资源较少的环境。本项目旨在制定一套建议,以改善马来西亚的协作实践。

方法

在第一阶段,进行了定性研究,以更好地了解一家精神病医院的协作情况(此前已发表)。在第二阶段,成立了来自同一家医院的地方医院层面委员会,根据定性研究采取行动,并制定一套建议,以改善该医院的协作实践。其中一些建议在可行的情况下得到了实施,并对结果进行了讨论。然后将这些建议发送给一个全国性的德尔菲小组。这些委员会由不同专业的医护人员、患者和护理人员组成。

结果

德尔菲小组经过三轮达成了共识。建议包括改善医院协作问题解决和决策的方法、提高患者、护理人员和工作人员的自主性及关联性的方法,以及提高资源水平的方法(如对工作人员进行技能培训,让有精神障碍生活经历的人做出贡献)。

结论

本研究表明,德尔菲法是在马来西亚制定建议和指南的一种可行方法,与传统的制定指南和建议的方法相比,能让更广泛的利益相关者参与其中。在马来西亚国家医学研究注册处注册,NMRR-13-308-14792。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c0/7304147/5f30058ab415/13033_2020_374_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验