Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 24;71(Suppl 1):S43-S51. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa307.
We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question "What diagnostic considerations should be taken into account when screening for syphilis using the traditional or reverse algorithm?" Improved laboratory diagnosis of syphilis is an important element of the effort to reduce syphilis rates. Screening for syphilis is performed using either a nontreponemal or treponemal test (part of the traditional or reverse algorithm, respectively). Both syphilis algorithms are used by laboratories. However, there are limited data on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the algorithms. An expert panel generated "key questions" in the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. This paper pertains to the key factors that should be considered when deciding whether to screen for syphilis using either the traditional or the reverse algorithm. A systematic literature review was performed, and tables of evidence were created to address this question.
我们回顾了相关的梅毒诊断文献,以回答“在使用传统或反向算法筛查梅毒时应考虑哪些诊断因素?”改善梅毒的实验室诊断是降低梅毒发病率的重要组成部分。梅毒筛查使用非梅毒螺旋体或梅毒螺旋体试验(分别为传统或反向算法的一部分)进行。两种梅毒算法都被实验室使用。然而,关于算法的性能和成本效益的数据有限。一个专家小组在梅毒的实验室诊断中提出了“关键问题”。本文涉及决定使用传统或反向算法筛查梅毒时应考虑的关键因素。进行了系统的文献回顾,并创建了证据表来回答这个问题。