Huang Yong, Ge Kuanxue, Fu Guangshun, Chu Junfeng, Wei Wei
Department of General Surgery, Jiangdu People's Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangdu People's Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 5;7:205. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00205. eCollection 2020.
It was a difficult question to identify candidates who would benefit most from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer because of the paucity of relevant conclusive clinical trial results. We aimed to assess if mucinous adenocarcinoma (MUA) could be an indicator for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. Using SEERStat software V.8.3.5, eligible patients were then recruited from the SEER database. A χ test was applied to compare the distribution of different categorical variables between nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (NMUA) and MUA groups. We then used the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze overall survival (OS) of different histological types in stage II colon cancer, and the log-rank test was then used to assess the OS differences. The Cox proportional regression risk models were also built in our analyses to eliminate potential crossed bias from other prognostic factors. A total of 50,065 patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer were recruited from the SEER database from 2004 to 2011; all the patients were divided into two groups, including NMUA ( = 44,785) and MUA ( = 5,280). The Cox analysis of the histological type indicated that the survival difference between MUA and NMUA failed to reach statistical significance in stage II colon cancer ( = 0.360). In NMUA, patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with 37.2% decreased risk of overall mortality compared with those not [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.628, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.601-1.656, < 0.001]; in MUA, the number increased to 41.5% (HR = 0.585, 95% CI = 0.515-0.665, < 0.001). Our study showed that the survival difference between MUA and NMUA failed to reach statistical significance in stage II colon cancer. More importantly, our study had provided the first evidence that chemotherapy would offer higher survival improvement in MUA compared with NMUA in stage II colon cancer; mucinous histology might be an indicator for enhanced survival benefit of chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.
由于相关的确凿临床试验结果匮乏,因此很难确定哪些II期结肠癌患者能从辅助化疗中获益最多。我们旨在评估黏液腺癌(MUA)是否可作为II期结肠癌辅助化疗疗效的一个指标。利用SEERStat软件V.8.3.5,我们从SEER数据库中招募符合条件的患者。应用χ检验比较非黏液腺癌(NMUA)组和MUA组不同分类变量的分布情况。然后我们采用Kaplan-Meier方法分析II期结肠癌不同组织学类型的总生存期(OS),并使用对数秩检验评估OS差异。我们还在分析中构建了Cox比例回归风险模型,以消除其他预后因素潜在的交叉偏倚。2004年至2011年期间,我们从SEER数据库中总共招募了50,065例诊断为II期结肠癌的患者;所有患者被分为两组,包括NMUA(n = 44,785)和MUA(n = 5,280)。组织学类型的Cox分析表明,II期结肠癌中MUA和NMUA之间的生存差异未达到统计学显著性(P = 0.360)。在NMUA中,接受辅助化疗的患者与未接受辅助化疗的患者相比,总体死亡风险独立降低37.2%[风险比(HR)= 0.628,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.601 - 0.656,P < 0.001];在MUA中,这一数字增至41.5%(HR = 0.585,95% CI = 0.515 - 0.665,P < 0.001)。我们的研究表明,II期结肠癌中MUA和NMUA之间的生存差异未达到统计学显著性。更重要的是,我们的研究首次提供了证据,表明在II期结肠癌中,与NMUA相比,化疗在MUA中能带来更高的生存改善;黏液性组织学可能是II期结肠癌化疗生存获益增强的一个指标。