Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India.
J Biosoc Sci. 2021 Jul;53(4):481-496. doi: 10.1017/S0021932020000310. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
The key recommendation of the Child Survival and Safe Motherhood programme was the provision of Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) for the prevention of maternal mortality, especially in developing countries like India. The objectives of this paper were three-fold: to examine the socioeconomic differentials in mean out-of-pocket expenditure on EmOC in public and private health care facilities in India; to evaluate the catastrophic health expenditure of households at the threshold levels of 5% and 10%; and finally, to assess the effects of various socioeconomic and demographic covariates on the levels of catastrophic health expenditure on EmOC. Data were extracted from the 71st round of the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) survey conducted in India between January and June 2014. A stratified multi-stage sampling design was followed to conduct the survey. The information was collected from 65,932 households (rural: 36,480; urban: 29,452) and 33,104 individuals across various states and union territories in India. However, the present study had taken only 1653 sample women who availed EmOC care during the last one year preceding the survey date. Binary logistic regression was applied. Large differences in out-of-pocket expenditure on EmOC were found between private and public health care facilities. Mean annual out-of-pocket expenditure by women in private hospitals was INR 23,309 (US$367), which was about 6 times higher than in public hospitals, where mean spending was INR 3651 (US$58). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between household socioeconomic status and level of catastrophic health expenditure on EmOC. The odds of catastrophic health expenditure in public health facilities among women from the North region were higher than among those from the Central, South and West regions. Age and level of education significantly influenced the mean level of catastrophic health expenditure. Access to good-quality obstetric care is key to reducing the maternal mortality rate and child deaths, and thus achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3. There is an urgent need for policy interventions to reduce the financial burden of households in accessing obstetric care in India.
儿童生存和母婴安全方案的主要建议是提供紧急产科护理(EmOC),以预防孕产妇死亡,特别是在印度等发展中国家。本文的目的有三:一是考察印度公共和私人医疗保健机构中 EmOC 的平均自付支出在社会经济方面的差异;二是评估家庭在 5%和 10%门槛水平的灾难性卫生支出;最后,评估各种社会经济和人口统计学协变量对 EmOC 灾难性卫生支出水平的影响。数据来自印度国家抽样调查办公室(NSSO)于 2014 年 1 月至 6 月进行的第 71 轮调查。调查采用分层多阶段抽样设计。该信息来自印度各邦和联邦属地的 65932 户家庭(农村:36480 户;城市:29452 户)和 33104 名个人。然而,本研究仅选取了 1653 名在调查前一年接受过 EmOC 护理的样本妇女。采用二元逻辑回归分析。在私人和公共医疗保健机构之间发现 EmOC 的自付支出存在很大差异。在私立医院就诊的妇女的年平均自付支出为 23309 印度卢比(367 美元),是在公立医院就诊的 3651 印度卢比(58 美元)的 6 倍左右。此外,逻辑回归分析显示,家庭社会经济地位与 EmOC 的灾难性卫生支出水平之间存在显著关联。来自北方邦的妇女在公立医院就诊的灾难性卫生支出的可能性高于来自中部、南部和西部的妇女。年龄和教育水平显著影响灾难性卫生支出的平均水平。获得高质量的产科护理是降低孕产妇死亡率和儿童死亡率、从而实现可持续发展目标 3 的关键。印度迫切需要政策干预措施,以减轻家庭获得产科护理的经济负担。