Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, University of Novi Sad.
Department of Psychology, Ohio University.
Psychol Assess. 2020 Oct;32(10):915-927. doi: 10.1037/pas0000940. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
Anxiety sensitivity (AS) is an established transdiagnostic risk factor for emotional disorders. It is defined as the fear of anxiety sensations that arises from beliefs that those sensations can have harmful consequences on cognitive, physical, and social functioning. Thus, AS is usually considered a multidimensional construct comprised of the following dimensions: Cognitive, Physical, and Social concerns. Some studies have questioned its continuous latent structure providing taxometric evidence for its categorical nature. However, more advanced factor mixture modeling (FMM) has offered support for a hybrid, dimensional-categorial latent structure of AS. In other words, 3 qualitatively different classes were identified, with a 3-factor model within each class. In the current study, FMM was used in 2 independent Serbian samples: an adult convenient community (Facebook) sample ( = 359) and a young treatment-seeking sample ( = 342). The obtained results are fairly in line with the most recent work targeting the nature of the AS construct, using the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3). By model fit, especially comparing the 2- and 3-class solution in Sample 1, and testing external validity in Sample 2, the empirical evidence supports the 3-class solution, with classes labeled as Normative AS, Moderate AS, and High AS. Important theoretical and practical questions were raised and discussed in the article. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
焦虑敏感 (AS) 是情绪障碍的一个既定的跨诊断风险因素。它被定义为对焦虑感的恐惧,这种恐惧源于这样一种信念,即这些感觉会对认知、身体和社交功能产生有害影响。因此,AS 通常被认为是一个多维度的结构,包括以下维度:认知、身体和社会关注。一些研究对其连续潜在结构提出了质疑,提供了其分类性质的计量证据。然而,更先进的因子混合建模 (FMM) 为 AS 的混合维度分类潜在结构提供了支持。换句话说,确定了 3 种不同性质的类别,每个类别都有一个 3 因素模型。在当前的研究中,FMM 用于两个独立的塞尔维亚样本:一个成人方便社区(Facebook)样本(n = 359)和一个年轻的寻求治疗的样本(n = 342)。得到的结果与最近针对 AS 结构性质的工作相当,使用了焦虑敏感指数-3(ASI-3)。通过模型拟合,特别是在样本 1 中比较 2 类和 3 类的解决方案,并在样本 2 中测试外部有效性,实证证据支持 3 类解决方案,将类别标记为正常 AS、中度 AS 和高度 AS。在文章中提出并讨论了一些重要的理论和实践问题。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。