Deveikis A, Ward J, Kim K S
Department of Pediatrics, UCLA School of Medicine, Harbor/UCLA Medical Centre, Torrance 90509.
Vaccine. 1988 Feb;6(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(88)90007-2.
To determine the in vitro and in vivo activity of human antibody induced by different Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines, pooled human antisera obtained from adults immunized with either polyribosyl ribitol phosphate (PRP) or PRP-conjugated with diphtheria toxoid (PRP-D) vaccines were evaluated for opsonic and protective activity against Hib. In vitro, opsonophagocytic studies revealed that PRP-D induced antisera were approximately 2.5-fold more effective than PRP-induced antisera in supporting neutrophil-mediated killing of an Hib strain. In vivo studies using the infant rat model or Hib disease revealed that the decay of PRP antibody was similar with PRP or PRP-D induced antisera in unchallenged rats. However, in infant rats challenged with Hib, the PRP induced antibody decayed more rapidly than the PRP-D induced antibody as shown by significantly shorter half-life of the former. The protective efficacy was significantly greater with the PRP-D induced antisera than with the PRP induced antisera. This finding was shown by the significantly lower incidence of bacteraemia and the 5-fold lower dose of antibody required for 50% protection against bacteraemia in rats receiving the PRP-D induced antisera. The findings suggest that antibody to PRP induced by PRP-D vaccine is more opsonic and protective against Hib, and also decays more slowly in infant rats challenged with Hib than does antibody induced by PRP vaccine. Further studies are needed to elucidate the reason(s) for this difference in functional activity and in half-life of PRP antibody induced by PRP or by PRP-D vaccines.
为了确定不同b型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)疫苗诱导产生的人抗体的体外和体内活性,对从接种多聚核糖磷酸(PRP)或与白喉类毒素结合的PRP(PRP-D)疫苗的成人中获得的混合人抗血清进行了评估,以检测其对Hib的调理和保护活性。在体外,调理吞噬研究表明,PRP-D诱导的抗血清在支持中性粒细胞介导的Hib菌株杀伤方面比PRP诱导的抗血清有效约2.5倍。使用幼鼠模型或Hib疾病进行的体内研究表明,在未受攻击的大鼠中,PRP抗体的衰减与PRP或PRP-D诱导的抗血清相似。然而,在用Hib攻击的幼鼠中,PRP诱导的抗体比PRP-D诱导的抗体衰减得更快,前者的半衰期明显更短。PRP-D诱导的抗血清的保护效力明显高于PRP诱导的抗血清。这一发现表现为接受PRP-D诱导抗血清的大鼠中菌血症的发生率显著降低,以及预防菌血症所需的抗体剂量降低5倍。这些发现表明,PRP-D疫苗诱导的PRP抗体对Hib具有更强的调理和保护作用,并且在用Hib攻击的幼鼠中比PRP疫苗诱导的抗体衰减更慢。需要进一步研究以阐明PRP或PRP-D疫苗诱导的PRP抗体在功能活性和半衰期方面存在这种差异的原因。